<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Build me a distributed LazyWeb!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/01/20/build-me-a-distributed-lazyweb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/01/20/build-me-a-distributed-lazyweb/</link>
	<description>This can all be made better. Ready? Begin.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd D Budd</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/01/20/build-me-a-distributed-lazyweb/comment-page-1/#comment-1876</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd D Budd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 07:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/01/20/build-me-a-distributed-lazyweb/#comment-1876</guid>
		<description>Fantastic! What blows me away is the lack of a good open source Calander / ToDo List / Getting Things Down webservice with a offline desktop component.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic! What blows me away is the lack of a good open source Calander / ToDo List / Getting Things Down webservice with a offline desktop component.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Douglas</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/01/20/build-me-a-distributed-lazyweb/comment-page-1/#comment-1873</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 02:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/01/20/build-me-a-distributed-lazyweb/#comment-1873</guid>
		<description>Beautiful! That's a lot like a few ideas I've been chasing for a few years -- am I right in characterizing your idea as an ad-hocracy for (possibly) open-source programming?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful! That&#8217;s a lot like a few ideas I&#8217;ve been chasing for a few years &#8212; am I right in characterizing your idea as an ad-hocracy for (possibly) open-source programming?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
