<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hey, uh&#8230; Google?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/02/10/hey-uh-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/02/10/hey-uh-google/</link>
	<description>This can all be made better. Ready? Begin.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: smallchou.com/blog &#187; MID-WEEK MUSINGS</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/02/10/hey-uh-google/#comment-32579</link>
		<dc:creator>smallchou.com/blog &#187; MID-WEEK MUSINGS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/02/10/hey-uh-google/#comment-32579</guid>
		<description>[...] it&#8217;s an interesting rant by the other two parties. my take? google deals in the constraints of technology and user expectations, not of manpower and resources. does that mean that they can&#8217;t talk about constraint? no, but they should be sure about what they&#8217;re referring to. mayer seems to do a good job of that. does that mean a company like 37 Signals is BETTER to talk about constraint? probably yes. to me, google is just another company making the transition from innovator to large market pusher. it&#8217;s an oft-traveled path by many companies, groups, and even popular culture icons. what comes along with that path is criticism, unfounded or founded. they&#8217;ll be dealing with that a lot (see: recent china and google desktop controversies). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it&#8217;s an interesting rant by the other two parties. my take? google deals in the constraints of technology and user expectations, not of manpower and resources. does that mean that they can&#8217;t talk about constraint? no, but they should be sure about what they&#8217;re referring to. mayer seems to do a good job of that. does that mean a company like 37 Signals is BETTER to talk about constraint? probably yes. to me, google is just another company making the transition from innovator to large market pusher. it&#8217;s an oft-traveled path by many companies, groups, and even popular culture icons. what comes along with that path is criticism, unfounded or founded. they&#8217;ll be dealing with that a lot (see: recent china and google desktop controversies). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
