Comments on: On the JOT acquisition rumor… http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/05/15/on-the-jot-acquisition-rumor/ This can all be made better. Ready? Begin. Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:32:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: FactoryJoe http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/05/15/on-the-jot-acquisition-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-3722 FactoryJoe Tue, 16 May 2006 12:01:19 +0000 http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/05/15/on-the-jot-acquisition-rumor/#comment-3722 Ah, fair enough. Still, you do make for a spicy number! ;) Ah, fair enough. Still, you do make for a spicy number! ;)

]]> By: Alex Russell http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/05/15/on-the-jot-acquisition-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-3702 Alex Russell Tue, 16 May 2006 03:00:51 +0000 http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/05/15/on-the-jot-acquisition-rumor/#comment-3702 Yahoo has tons of great DHTML hackers and code (actually, like most big web companies, they've got more code than people who remember what it was written for). They'd be kinda silly to buy a company to get an open source toolkit they can use for free anyway. If anyone will be acquiring Jot, it would be for their amazing server-side platform, loyal customers, and the outstanding team that's making it the best thing for collaboration since stone tablets. Yahoo has tons of great DHTML hackers and code (actually, like most big web companies, they’ve got more code than people who remember what it was written for). They’d be kinda silly to buy a company to get an open source toolkit they can use for free anyway.

If anyone will be acquiring Jot, it would be for their amazing server-side platform, loyal customers, and the outstanding team that’s making it the best thing for collaboration since stone tablets.

]]>