<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Follow up on the mousetrap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/08/22/follow-up-on-the-mousetrap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/08/22/follow-up-on-the-mousetrap/</link>
	<description>This can all be made better. Ready? Begin.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 00:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Opposable Mind</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/08/22/follow-up-on-the-mousetrap/comment-page-1/#comment-14690</link>
		<dc:creator>Opposable Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/08/22/follow-up-on-the-mousetrap/#comment-14690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Safety for whom...&lt;/strong&gt;

Chris Messina wrote a bit about Google, authentication and the GData API. Then followed it up with another post clarifying some of the issues. There are a few meta-notions that I&#039;ve been watching that I think are relevant to discussions...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Safety for whom&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Chris Messina wrote a bit about Google, authentication and the GData API. Then followed it up with another post clarifying some of the issues. There are a few meta-notions that I&#8217;ve been watching that I think are relevant to discussions&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Better mousetrap or a new form of lock-in?</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/08/22/follow-up-on-the-mousetrap/comment-page-1/#comment-14687</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Better mousetrap or a new form of lock-in?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/08/22/follow-up-on-the-mousetrap/#comment-14687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Chris follows up with a clarification to his original post: Apparently I could have been more clear in my post on the Google Authentication mousetrap, so hereâ€™s some additional summary points: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chris follows up with a clarification to his original post: Apparently I could have been more clear in my post on the Google Authentication mousetrap, so hereâ€™s some additional summary points: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B.K. DeLong</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/08/22/follow-up-on-the-mousetrap/comment-page-1/#comment-14657</link>
		<dc:creator>B.K. DeLong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/08/22/follow-up-on-the-mousetrap/#comment-14657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That proposal looks incredibly promising, Gregor - good group of initial committers and mentors. I really hope someone comes up with more solid infrastructure and tools to manage trust relationships across the Web. So far, the closest it&#039;s gotten is with FOAF and some work done at UMD. Putting privacy control in users hands is great but if you don&#039;t give said participants to set trust levels for friends/contacts and sites then we&#039;re still missing a large degree of control over our own information.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That proposal looks incredibly promising, Gregor &#8211; good group of initial committers and mentors. I really hope someone comes up with more solid infrastructure and tools to manage trust relationships across the Web. So far, the closest it&#8217;s gotten is with FOAF and some work done at UMD. Putting privacy control in users hands is great but if you don&#8217;t give said participants to set trust levels for friends/contacts and sites then we&#8217;re still missing a large degree of control over our own information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregor J. Rothfuss</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/08/22/follow-up-on-the-mousetrap/comment-page-1/#comment-14645</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregor J. Rothfuss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 02:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/08/22/follow-up-on-the-mousetrap/#comment-14645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remain hopeful that Google will open up their Auth infrastructure, or make it interoperable with others. They recently hired Ben Laurie (author of mod_ssl, and a security expert), and Ben, in turn, is backing an Apache project under incubation that is trying to implement a single sign on solution around OpenID:

http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HeraldryIdentityProposal

The fact that Ben chose to wear his Google hat while mentoring this project (he could easily have used his Apache hat instead) makes me believe Google are up to something in this space.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remain hopeful that Google will open up their Auth infrastructure, or make it interoperable with others. They recently hired Ben Laurie (author of mod_ssl, and a security expert), and Ben, in turn, is backing an Apache project under incubation that is trying to implement a single sign on solution around OpenID:</p>
<p><a href="http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HeraldryIdentityProposal" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HeraldryIdentityProposal</a></p>
<p>The fact that Ben chose to wear his Google hat while mentoring this project (he could easily have used his Apache hat instead) makes me believe Google are up to something in this space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
