<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Throwing punches from the future at the past</title>
	<atom:link href="http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/10/09/throwing-punches-from-the-future-at-the-past/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/10/09/throwing-punches-from-the-future-at-the-past/</link>
	<description>This can all be made better. Ready? Begin.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:30:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.superfeedr.com"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Mike D.</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/10/09/throwing-punches-from-the-future-at-the-past/comment-page-1/#comment-20979</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 01:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/10/09/throwing-punches-from-the-future-at-the-past/#comment-20979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s enlightening to watch how people who weren&#039;t at this panel are reacting to it.  People like to reduce things down to X vs. Y since it&#039;s easier to think of that way, but the brouhaha wasn&#039;t about Mike&#039;s view of media versus The New York Times&#039; view of media at all.  The brouhaha was about *how* things were said.  I think the same conversation could have been had in a more calculated and reasonable fashion and everyone would have been fine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s enlightening to watch how people who weren&#8217;t at this panel are reacting to it.  People like to reduce things down to X vs. Y since it&#8217;s easier to think of that way, but the brouhaha wasn&#8217;t about Mike&#8217;s view of media versus The New York Times&#8217; view of media at all.  The brouhaha was about *how* things were said.  I think the same conversation could have been had in a more calculated and reasonable fashion and everyone would have been fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
