<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Searching for the Noah&#8217;s Ark of Syndicated Content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/12/07/searching-for-the-noahs-ark-of-syndicated-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/12/07/searching-for-the-noahs-ark-of-syndicated-content/</link>
	<description>This can all be made better. Ready? Begin.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: brydon</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/12/07/searching-for-the-noahs-ark-of-syndicated-content/#comment-34061</link>
		<dc:creator>brydon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 22:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/12/07/searching-for-the-noahs-ark-of-syndicated-content/#comment-34061</guid>
		<description>I was feeling the same way post Mesh last year...http://shiftmode.com/2006/05/mesh-notes-rss.html

I'm not sure technology will solve this one. As you say, a better aggregator is still just an aggregator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was feeling the same way post Mesh last year&#8230;http://shiftmode.com/2006/05/mesh-notes-rss.html</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure technology will solve this one. As you say, a better aggregator is still just an aggregator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Na Web 2</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/12/07/searching-for-the-noahs-ark-of-syndicated-content/#comment-32198</link>
		<dc:creator>Na Web 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 14:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/12/07/searching-for-the-noahs-ark-of-syndicated-content/#comment-32198</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;spokeo - one destination...&lt;/strong&gt;

Em quantos serviÃ§os online estÃ£o inscritos?
Com o spokeo, vamos poder mostrar Ã  nossa rede de amigos que estamos registados em determinados sites.
Os criadores do serviÃ§o dizem que vamos simplificar a nossa vida online, vamos ver se resulta.
O regi...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>spokeo - one destination&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Em quantos serviÃ§os online estÃ£o inscritos?<br />
Com o spokeo, vamos poder mostrar Ã  nossa rede de amigos que estamos registados em determinados sites.<br />
Os criadores do serviÃ§o dizem que vamos simplificar a nossa vida online, vamos ver se resulta.<br />
O regi&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Franusic</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/12/07/searching-for-the-noahs-ark-of-syndicated-content/#comment-31895</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Franusic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/12/07/searching-for-the-noahs-ark-of-syndicated-content/#comment-31895</guid>
		<description>The total number of "sites" that I've been able to monitor has gone up dramatically since I started using Bloglines. It isn't Noah's Ark, but is a great place to start.

I've been making it a point to keep only the feeds that consistently provide me with interesting reading.

An idea that comes to mind would be mashing a site like Bloglines together with a site like del.icio.us or Ma.gnolia. I would love to be able to see which blog posts have been bookmarked by other people in my "friends group".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The total number of &#8220;sites&#8221; that I&#8217;ve been able to monitor has gone up dramatically since I started using Bloglines. It isn&#8217;t Noah&#8217;s Ark, but is a great place to start.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been making it a point to keep only the feeds that consistently provide me with interesting reading.</p>
<p>An idea that comes to mind would be mashing a site like Bloglines together with a site like del.icio.us or Ma.gnolia. I would love to be able to see which blog posts have been bookmarked by other people in my &#8220;friends group&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/12/07/searching-for-the-noahs-ark-of-syndicated-content/#comment-31765</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 01:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/12/07/searching-for-the-noahs-ark-of-syndicated-content/#comment-31765</guid>
		<description>I'd love to see a TiVo/Pandora sort of thumbs up thumbs down rating system with a feed reader.  

I also thing there is room for a sort of intelligent algorithm that would weigh many factors: what your trusted friends are reading, what posts receive the most stars, bookmarks, links, comments, etc.  Imagine a user experience where you are simply presented with a stream of posts  "what we think you might be most interested in" and then a "more" button.  Ultimately, while it may be possible to get to the bottom of your inbox, there is really no getting to the bottom of feeds.  Often feeds are treated like an inbox, but I think we're going to have to gradually let go of this approach.  There is simply too much (marginally) interesting stuff.

One final thing - RSS feeds still aren't the kind of thing my mom would want to use.  I think what is going to push adoption of feeds into the mainstream is when they become seamlessly integrated with video content.  Reading a few websites in one place?  Big deal.  But getting your children's photos and your Desperate Housewives episodes in one place?  That is disruptive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to see a TiVo/Pandora sort of thumbs up thumbs down rating system with a feed reader.  </p>
<p>I also thing there is room for a sort of intelligent algorithm that would weigh many factors: what your trusted friends are reading, what posts receive the most stars, bookmarks, links, comments, etc.  Imagine a user experience where you are simply presented with a stream of posts  &#8220;what we think you might be most interested in&#8221; and then a &#8220;more&#8221; button.  Ultimately, while it may be possible to get to the bottom of your inbox, there is really no getting to the bottom of feeds.  Often feeds are treated like an inbox, but I think we&#8217;re going to have to gradually let go of this approach.  There is simply too much (marginally) interesting stuff.</p>
<p>One final thing - RSS feeds still aren&#8217;t the kind of thing my mom would want to use.  I think what is going to push adoption of feeds into the mainstream is when they become seamlessly integrated with video content.  Reading a few websites in one place?  Big deal.  But getting your children&#8217;s photos and your Desperate Housewives episodes in one place?  That is disruptive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.328 seconds -->
