<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Burning Man trademark controversy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/01/25/the-burning-man-trademark-controversy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/01/25/the-burning-man-trademark-controversy/</link>
	<description>This can all be made better. Ready? Begin.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:32:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: kabababrubarta</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/01/25/the-burning-man-trademark-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-68251</link>
		<dc:creator>kabababrubarta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 00:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/01/25/the-burning-man-trademark-controversy/#comment-68251</guid>
		<description>Nice design! kabababrubarta</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice design! kabababrubarta</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FotoSessoIt</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/01/25/the-burning-man-trademark-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-59128</link>
		<dc:creator>FotoSessoIt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/01/25/the-burning-man-trademark-controversy/#comment-59128</guid>
		<description>Sorry, you have a well done site ..! 
 I want to find some adult site .. like  
http://massaggio-bari.foto-e-video-gratis.com - massaggio bari</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, you have a well done site ..!<br />
 I want to find some adult site .. like<br />
<a href="http://massaggio-bari.foto-e-video-gratis.com" rel="nofollow">http://massaggio-bari.foto-e-video-gratis.com</a> &#8211; massaggio bari</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Brogan...</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/01/25/the-burning-man-trademark-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-46598</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Brogan...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 04:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/01/25/the-burning-man-trademark-controversy/#comment-46598</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this write-up, and all the thought and attention you gave to the matter. Being that Christopher Penn and I started &lt;a href=&quot;http://podcamp.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PodCamp&lt;/a&gt; loosely based on what we loved about BarCamp&#039;s methods, we&#039;ve launched into a similar space. We opensourced PodCamp as an experience directly after the first event, encouraging people to run their own, (thankfully, they have, and with some success). 

But we&#039;ve had those talks. What if *.evil came and co-opted the name to run a vendor-heavy event cloaked as an unconference? What will other groups running an event do that might visit ill will back on the original group? 

Your conversation here, and the great links you gave to other posts and resources (I got SO excited, because I thought your link to Ori was going to uncover a blog I didn&#039;t know about- I&#039;ve got his book), really helped enrich this. 

Glad I read about your post on Twitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this write-up, and all the thought and attention you gave to the matter. Being that Christopher Penn and I started <a href="http://podcamp.org" rel="nofollow">PodCamp</a> loosely based on what we loved about BarCamp&#8217;s methods, we&#8217;ve launched into a similar space. We opensourced PodCamp as an experience directly after the first event, encouraging people to run their own, (thankfully, they have, and with some success). </p>
<p>But we&#8217;ve had those talks. What if *.evil came and co-opted the name to run a vendor-heavy event cloaked as an unconference? What will other groups running an event do that might visit ill will back on the original group? </p>
<p>Your conversation here, and the great links you gave to other posts and resources (I got SO excited, because I thought your link to Ori was going to uncover a blog I didn&#8217;t know about- I&#8217;ve got his book), really helped enrich this. </p>
<p>Glad I read about your post on Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laughing Squid &#187; John Law Sues His Former Burning Man Partners</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/01/25/the-burning-man-trademark-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-46202</link>
		<dc:creator>Laughing Squid &#187; John Law Sues His Former Burning Man Partners</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 06:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/01/25/the-burning-man-trademark-controversy/#comment-46202</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;The Burning Man trademark controversy&#8221; (Chris Messina, FactoryCity) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;The Burning Man trademark controversy&#8221; (Chris Messina, FactoryCity) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

