<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Data portability and thinking ahead to 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/11/26/data-portability-and-thinking-ahead-to-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/11/26/data-portability-and-thinking-ahead-to-2008/</link>
	<description>This can all be made better. Ready? Begin.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:39:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Unit Structures &#8211; Linking Unit Structures</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/11/26/data-portability-and-thinking-ahead-to-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-99989</link>
		<dc:creator>Unit Structures &#8211; Linking Unit Structures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/11/26/data-portability-and-thinking-ahead-to-2008/#comment-99989</guid>
		<description>[...] DataPortability can keep up its shell game for Techcrunch crowd, but moves like Kveton&#8217;s (and Chris Messina&#8217;s) have tremendous influence among people actually building [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DataPortability can keep up its shell game for Techcrunch crowd, but moves like Kveton&#8217;s (and Chris Messina&#8217;s) have tremendous influence among people actually building [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; June 6th blogging - '08</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/11/26/data-portability-and-thinking-ahead-to-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-99327</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; June 6th blogging - '08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 03:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/11/26/data-portability-and-thinking-ahead-to-2008/#comment-99327</guid>
		<description>[...] it seems like a lot of people and organizations are quitting Dataportability.org.  I wonder why?  Let see is any of the scandal rags and so-called blogging leaders pick up on this.  This [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it seems like a lot of people and organizations are quitting Dataportability.org.  I wonder why?  Let see is any of the scandal rags and so-called blogging leaders pick up on this.  This [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Kveton &#183; I&#8217;m for the Open Web</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/11/26/data-portability-and-thinking-ahead-to-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-99325</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Kveton &#183; I&#8217;m for the Open Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/11/26/data-portability-and-thinking-ahead-to-2008/#comment-99325</guid>
		<description>[...] the Data Portability project have hinted (both publicly and privately) at leaving. Others have just outright [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Data Portability project have hinted (both publicly and privately) at leaving. Others have just outright [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nodalities &#187; Blog Archive &#187; This Week&#8217;s Semantic Web</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/11/26/data-portability-and-thinking-ahead-to-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-98893</link>
		<dc:creator>Nodalities &#187; Blog Archive &#187; This Week&#8217;s Semantic Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/11/26/data-portability-and-thinking-ahead-to-2008/#comment-98893</guid>
		<description>[...] Data portability and thinking ahead to 2008 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Data portability and thinking ahead to 2008 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Social Web Now: #5 at Like It Matters</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/11/26/data-portability-and-thinking-ahead-to-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-97280</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Social Web Now: #5 at Like It Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/11/26/data-portability-and-thinking-ahead-to-2008/#comment-97280</guid>
		<description>[...] lays out some issues to wrestle with in 2008, as we try to make data portability [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lays out some issues to wrestle with in 2008, as we try to make data portability [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Burgeoning Openly Owned Web</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/11/26/data-portability-and-thinking-ahead-to-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-97243</link>
		<dc:creator>The Burgeoning Openly Owned Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/11/26/data-portability-and-thinking-ahead-to-2008/#comment-97243</guid>
		<description>[...] Excellent post on data portability and control that captures important issues that we&#8217;ve talked about: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Excellent post on data portability and control that captures important issues that we&#8217;ve talked about: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week&#8217;s Bookmarks at Not So Relevant</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/11/26/data-portability-and-thinking-ahead-to-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-97240</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week&#8217;s Bookmarks at Not So Relevant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 08:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/11/26/data-portability-and-thinking-ahead-to-2008/#comment-97240</guid>
		<description>[...] Data portability and thinking ahead to 2008 &#124; FactoryCity [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Data portability and thinking ahead to 2008 | FactoryCity [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Old Network &#187; Blog Archive &#187; OpenLifeBits - For Your Digital Stuff</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/11/26/data-portability-and-thinking-ahead-to-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-97207</link>
		<dc:creator>This Old Network &#187; Blog Archive &#187; OpenLifeBits - For Your Digital Stuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/11/26/data-portability-and-thinking-ahead-to-2008/#comment-97207</guid>
		<description>[...] been hanging around this space for a while as well and posted two solid write-ups this past week - on data portability and data [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been hanging around this space for a while as well and posted two solid write-ups this past week &#8211; on data portability and data [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Blanar</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/11/26/data-portability-and-thinking-ahead-to-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-97151</link>
		<dc:creator>David Blanar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/11/26/data-portability-and-thinking-ahead-to-2008/#comment-97151</guid>
		<description>This is an important discussion; I would, however, suggest stressing the distinction between &#039;privacy&#039; and &#039;anonymity&#039; - they are not necessarily synonymous.

A transaction online is no different than one in the public square, where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy and limited expectation of anonymity: some transactions may be public but anonymous: for example, a charitable donation.

If we accept legal, commercial transactions require a legitimate buyer and seller, it follows there will no privacy and limited anonymity - this is by design.  In which case, I would argue the greatest challenge lies in creating a frictionless, common ID system, facilitating all web transactions, commercial or social.  The challenge is not protecting a Facebook news feed, the equivalent of standing on Speaker&#039;s Corner and ranting at the rain.

Privacy *is* an illusion; it is therefore incumbent upon us to be mindful of the only relevant question remaining: who is watching the watchers?

Thanks Chris, good stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an important discussion; I would, however, suggest stressing the distinction between &#8216;privacy&#8217; and &#8216;anonymity&#8217; &#8211; they are not necessarily synonymous.</p>
<p>A transaction online is no different than one in the public square, where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy and limited expectation of anonymity: some transactions may be public but anonymous: for example, a charitable donation.</p>
<p>If we accept legal, commercial transactions require a legitimate buyer and seller, it follows there will no privacy and limited anonymity &#8211; this is by design.  In which case, I would argue the greatest challenge lies in creating a frictionless, common ID system, facilitating all web transactions, commercial or social.  The challenge is not protecting a Facebook news feed, the equivalent of standing on Speaker&#8217;s Corner and ranting at the rain.</p>
<p>Privacy *is* an illusion; it is therefore incumbent upon us to be mindful of the only relevant question remaining: who is watching the watchers?</p>
<p>Thanks Chris, good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Messina</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/11/26/data-portability-and-thinking-ahead-to-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-97150</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Messina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/11/26/data-portability-and-thinking-ahead-to-2008/#comment-97150</guid>
		<description>@Jeremiah: Fixed, thanks! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jeremiah: Fixed, thanks! <img src='http://factoryjoe.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
