<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome and the future of browsers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2008/09/01/google-chrome-and-the-future-of-browsers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2008/09/01/google-chrome-and-the-future-of-browsers/</link>
	<description>This can all be made better. Ready? Begin.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:39:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kirao</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2008/09/01/google-chrome-and-the-future-of-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-104359</link>
		<dc:creator>kirao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=996#comment-104359</guid>
		<description>Chrome&#039;s Real opponent will be OPERA. Its one of the fastest and powerful browser (yet bit-infamaous) with almost all the features as Firefox and IE.  
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrome&#039;s Real opponent will be OPERA. Its one of the fastest and powerful browser (yet bit-infamaous) with almost all the features as Firefox and IE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario Fernandez</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2008/09/01/google-chrome-and-the-future-of-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-103823</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario Fernandez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=996#comment-103823</guid>
		<description>I say that Google Chrome is excellent for speed, performance, and security. I was very impressed with Google Chrome and enjoy using it, however I just had to switch to Apple Safari. Both are based on Webkit and I believe that Webkit is the best rendering engine for any web browser. Apple does have it’s reputation for the iPhone being still the most popular and unmatched mobile device. Apple Safari, even though Firefox took control, has been gaining more market share then ever and Google Chrome as well.
My point is, Apple Safari should be the king of all web browsers when it comes to ease of use, performance, and speed. Google Chrome definitely takes over speed, however when it comes to their UI and structure of their web browser, Safari takes the lead.
You may read my blog post here about my opinion with Google Chrome and Apple Safari: http://www.boricuaspacepr.net/profiles/blogs/google-chrome-might-actually</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say that Google Chrome is excellent for speed, performance, and security. I was very impressed with Google Chrome and enjoy using it, however I just had to switch to Apple Safari. Both are based on Webkit and I believe that Webkit is the best rendering engine for any web browser. Apple does have it’s reputation for the iPhone being still the most popular and unmatched mobile device. Apple Safari, even though Firefox took control, has been gaining more market share then ever and Google Chrome as well.<br />
My point is, Apple Safari should be the king of all web browsers when it comes to ease of use, performance, and speed. Google Chrome definitely takes over speed, however when it comes to their UI and structure of their web browser, Safari takes the lead.<br />
You may read my blog post here about my opinion with Google Chrome and Apple Safari: <a href="http://www.boricuaspacepr.net/profiles/blogs/google-chrome-might-actually" rel="nofollow">http://www.boricuaspacepr.net/profiles/blogs/google-chrome-might-actually</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Marketing</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2008/09/01/google-chrome-and-the-future-of-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-102646</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=996#comment-102646</guid>
		<description>Well Google Chrome has brough new standards to browsers, the V8 engine and tabs &quot;sandbox&quot; concepts are brilliant. Let&#039;s wait and see what more will it bring as further development proceeds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Google Chrome has brough new standards to browsers, the V8 engine and tabs &#8220;sandbox&#8221; concepts are brilliant. Let&#8217;s wait and see what more will it bring as further development proceeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Life As An Evangelist &#187; Thinking about Google Chrome from a Flash/AIR Perspective</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2008/09/01/google-chrome-and-the-future-of-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-101495</link>
		<dc:creator>Life As An Evangelist &#187; Thinking about Google Chrome from a Flash/AIR Perspective</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=996#comment-101495</guid>
		<description>[...] been a lot of good talk about Google Chrome and what it means for the web. I actually like Chris Messina&#8217;s take a lot partly because he&#8217;s so enthusiastic, but also because he&#8217;s generally right. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been a lot of good talk about Google Chrome and what it means for the web. I actually like Chris Messina&#8217;s take a lot partly because he&#8217;s so enthusiastic, but also because he&#8217;s generally right. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Analysis of Chrome &#171; Sideways8</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2008/09/01/google-chrome-and-the-future-of-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-101021</link>
		<dc:creator>Analysis of Chrome &#171; Sideways8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=996#comment-101021</guid>
		<description>[...] Flock - both browser companies - has a great post about how Chrome came to be and what it means (post is here).  Chrome is the future of browsers.  It&#8217;s one that embraces web applications and has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Flock &#8211; both browser companies &#8211; has a great post about how Chrome came to be and what it means (post is here).  Chrome is the future of browsers.  It&#8217;s one that embraces web applications and has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katy</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2008/09/01/google-chrome-and-the-future-of-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-100959</link>
		<dc:creator>katy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=996#comment-100959</guid>
		<description>Chrome&#039;s performance measurements on our product (http://www.taskwriter.com) makes it obvious that Chrome has the quality of speed: it&#039;s a lil bit faster then Firefox 3.0 and 6 times faster than IE. See the graphs here:http://www.taskwriter.com/blog/how-good-chrome-really-is</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrome&#8217;s performance measurements on our product (<a href="http://www.taskwriter.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.taskwriter.com</a>) makes it obvious that Chrome has the quality of speed: it&#8217;s a lil bit faster then Firefox 3.0 and 6 times faster than IE. See the graphs here:http://www.taskwriter.com/blog/how-good-chrome-really-is</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interesting stuff from around the web 2008-09-08 &#171; Derivadow.com</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2008/09/01/google-chrome-and-the-future-of-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-100486</link>
		<dc:creator>Interesting stuff from around the web 2008-09-08 &#171; Derivadow.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=996#comment-100486</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Chrome and the future of browsers [FactoryCity] I read announcement as the kid gloves coming off. I just can’t read this any other way than to think that Google’s finally fed up waiting around for Firefox to get their act together, fix their performance issues in serious ways, provide tangible and near-term vision and make good on their ultimate promise and value-proposition. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Chrome and the future of browsers [FactoryCity] I read announcement as the kid gloves coming off. I just can’t read this any other way than to think that Google’s finally fed up waiting around for Firefox to get their act together, fix their performance issues in serious ways, provide tangible and near-term vision and make good on their ultimate promise and value-proposition. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrome just Changed the Game &#8212; Oddly Zen</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2008/09/01/google-chrome-and-the-future-of-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-100428</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrome just Changed the Game &#8212; Oddly Zen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=996#comment-100428</guid>
		<description>[...] Microsoft is no doubt worried, shit-in-their-pants worried.  Suddenly the game is not Silverlight vs. Flash. It&#8217;s IE vs. Javascript. At least Chrome might spur a lazy industry into conforming to standards and treating web applications as first-class citizens.  Our web apps will access our systems like desktop applications. We get Gears baked in (note the lack of “Google” prefix — it’s now simply “of the web”) and if you’ve read the fine-print closely, you already know that this means that Chrome will be a self-updating, self-healing browser. This means that the web will rev at the speed of the frameworks and the specifications, and will no longer be tied to the monopoly player’s broken rendering engine.  ~Chris Messina [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft is no doubt worried, shit-in-their-pants worried.  Suddenly the game is not Silverlight vs. Flash. It&#8217;s IE vs. Javascript. At least Chrome might spur a lazy industry into conforming to standards and treating web applications as first-class citizens.  Our web apps will access our systems like desktop applications. We get Gears baked in (note the lack of “Google” prefix — it’s now simply “of the web”) and if you’ve read the fine-print closely, you already know that this means that Chrome will be a self-updating, self-healing browser. This means that the web will rev at the speed of the frameworks and the specifications, and will no longer be tied to the monopoly player’s broken rendering engine.  ~Chris Messina [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recent Links on Ma.gnolia at Fast Wonder Blog: Consulting, Online Communities, and Social Media</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2008/09/01/google-chrome-and-the-future-of-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-100342</link>
		<dc:creator>Recent Links on Ma.gnolia at Fast Wonder Blog: Consulting, Online Communities, and Social Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 06:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=996#comment-100342</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Chrome and the future of browsers &#124; FactoryCity [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Chrome and the future of browsers | FactoryCity [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Mettler</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2008/09/01/google-chrome-and-the-future-of-browsers/comment-page-1/#comment-100316</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Mettler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 22:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=996#comment-100316</guid>
		<description>@Félicien Breton: I know the history of WebKit. I guess I should have phrased it differently as I meant it the other way round, i.e. that AFAIK Chrome and Safari have the WebKit in common only (which is a lot already, but not everything that makes Chrome).

All in all, chances are that Safari, Firefox, Konqueror, Epiphany, IE etc. will catch-up with Chrome&#039;s concepts regarding better stability and speed, though rather in an evolutionary than revolutionary way. That is, they&#039;ll have to, in order to not vanish. We probably all agree that webapps will play a major role in the forseeable future of the web, not just content. Not even Microsoft is powerful enough to stop this tendency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Félicien Breton: I know the history of WebKit. I guess I should have phrased it differently as I meant it the other way round, i.e. that AFAIK Chrome and Safari have the WebKit in common only (which is a lot already, but not everything that makes Chrome).</p>
<p>All in all, chances are that Safari, Firefox, Konqueror, Epiphany, IE etc. will catch-up with Chrome&#8217;s concepts regarding better stability and speed, though rather in an evolutionary than revolutionary way. That is, they&#8217;ll have to, in order to not vanish. We probably all agree that webapps will play a major role in the forseeable future of the web, not just content. Not even Microsoft is powerful enough to stop this tendency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
