<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter and the Password Anti-Pattern</title>
	<atom:link href="http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/01/02/twitter-and-the-password-anti-pattern/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/01/02/twitter-and-the-password-anti-pattern/</link>
	<description>This can all be made better. Ready? Begin.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:24:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Identity, relationships and why OAuth and OpenID matter &#171; Derivadow.com</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/01/02/twitter-and-the-password-anti-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-103556</link>
		<dc:creator>Identity, relationships and why OAuth and OpenID matter &#171; Derivadow.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1092#comment-103556</guid>
		<description>[...] aren&#8217;t trying to do anything malicious &#8211; far from it &#8212; as Chris Messina explains: The difference between run-of-the-mill phishing and password anti-pattern cases is intent. Most [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] aren&#8217;t trying to do anything malicious &#8211; far from it &#8212; as Chris Messina explains: The difference between run-of-the-mill phishing and password anti-pattern cases is intent. Most [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Security Fiesta Post-Mortem &#124; Startup Security</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/01/02/twitter-and-the-password-anti-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-103541</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Security Fiesta Post-Mortem &#124; Startup Security</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1092#comment-103541</guid>
		<description>[...] can wade through the various misconceptions. Chris Messina actually has a fantastic blog post on password usage and Twitter. Unfortunately, there is still the misconception that OAuth would have fixed this and prevented the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can wade through the various misconceptions. Chris Messina actually has a fantastic blog post on password usage and Twitter. Unfortunately, there is still the misconception that OAuth would have fixed this and prevented the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OAuth for Twitter now!</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/01/02/twitter-and-the-password-anti-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-103535</link>
		<dc:creator>OAuth for Twitter now!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1092#comment-103535</guid>
		<description>[...] application need a reliable and useful authentication-mechanism as well. As Chris Messina puts it: Everyone’s got their priorities and Twitter has come a long way in the past several months in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] application need a reliable and useful authentication-mechanism as well. As Chris Messina puts it: Everyone’s got their priorities and Twitter has come a long way in the past several months in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let&#39;s kill the password anti-pattern before the next web cycle » By Elias Bizannes » article » Liako.Biz</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/01/02/twitter-and-the-password-anti-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-103514</link>
		<dc:creator>Let&#39;s kill the password anti-pattern before the next web cycle » By Elias Bizannes » article » Liako.Biz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1092#comment-103514</guid>
		<description>[...] by Chris Messina, I would like to see us all agree on making 2009 the year we kill the password anti-pattern. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Chris Messina, I would like to see us all agree on making 2009 the year we kill the password anti-pattern. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buildblog &#124; Berühmte Twitter Accounts gehackt</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/01/02/twitter-and-the-password-anti-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-103503</link>
		<dc:creator>buildblog &#124; Berühmte Twitter Accounts gehackt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1092#comment-103503</guid>
		<description>[...] sie auch nicht gehackt, sondern jemand ganz anderes. Immerhin verwendet Twitter seit Ewigkeiten das Anti-Pattern der Authentifzierung schlechthin&#8230;  Tags: Password. hacking, Twitter, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sie auch nicht gehackt, sondern jemand ganz anderes. Immerhin verwendet Twitter seit Ewigkeiten das Anti-Pattern der Authentifzierung schlechthin&#8230;  Tags: Password. hacking, Twitter, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Network Security Blog &#187; Four information points on Twitter phishing</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/01/02/twitter-and-the-password-anti-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-103498</link>
		<dc:creator>Network Security Blog &#187; Four information points on Twitter phishing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1092#comment-103498</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter and the Password anti-pattern - I&#8217;ve only gotten about half way through this paper, but I like the ideas I&#8217;m reading.&#160; This is basically an argument for taking Twitter beyond username/password and adding in functionality that would allow you to share some of your capabilities as a user with a third party.&#160;&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter and the Password anti-pattern &#8211; I&#8217;ve only gotten about half way through this paper, but I like the ideas I&#8217;m reading.&nbsp; This is basically an argument for taking Twitter beyond username/password and adding in functionality that would allow you to share some of your capabilities as a user with a third party.&nbsp;&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perception and reality in the land of OpenID &#124; FactoryCity</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/01/02/twitter-and-the-password-anti-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-103465</link>
		<dc:creator>Perception and reality in the land of OpenID &#124; FactoryCity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 23:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1092#comment-103465</guid>
		<description>[...] FactoryCity This can all be made better. Ready? Begin.   Skip to content AboutArchivesTagsProjectsLinksScreenshotsContact     &#171; Twitter and the Password Anti-Pattern [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FactoryCity This can all be made better. Ready? Begin.   Skip to content AboutArchivesTagsProjectsLinksScreenshotsContact     &laquo; Twitter and the Password Anti-Pattern [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter and Facebook hit by phishing attacks &#124; Technology &#124; guardian.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/01/02/twitter-and-the-password-anti-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-103459</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter and Facebook hit by phishing attacks &#124; Technology &#124; guardian.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1092#comment-103459</guid>
		<description>[...] Chris Messina and others have pointed out, Twitter ought to support a mechanism such as OAuth for &#8220;delegated authentication&#8221;, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chris Messina and others have pointed out, Twitter ought to support a mechanism such as OAuth for &#8220;delegated authentication&#8221;, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Messina</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/01/02/twitter-and-the-password-anti-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-103435</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Messina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 03:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1092#comment-103435</guid>
		<description>The irony, Tom, is that Twitter titled their post &quot;Don&#039;t Share Your Secret Info!&quot; and yet that&#039;s the only way that you can use third-party apps, which Twitter clearly promotes. If Twitter says &quot;don&#039;t share your secret info&quot; but don&#039;t provide a way to still make use of third party apps, it&#039;s ironic because we&#039;ve been saying that all along.

I think it&#039;s time for your mom to send you to your room. You need to study more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The irony, Tom, is that Twitter titled their post &#8220;Don&#8217;t Share Your Secret Info!&#8221; and yet that&#8217;s the only way that you can use third-party apps, which Twitter clearly promotes. If Twitter says &#8220;don&#8217;t share your secret info&#8221; but don&#8217;t provide a way to still make use of third party apps, it&#8217;s ironic because we&#8217;ve been saying that all along.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s time for your mom to send you to your room. You need to study more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Cascio</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/01/02/twitter-and-the-password-anti-pattern/comment-page-1/#comment-103434</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Cascio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 03:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1092#comment-103434</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t buy the &quot;developers would have a lot of trouble understanding it&quot; argument. Yes, it&#039;s more involved than Simple Authentication but I was able to implement a web app client using the Flickr and Google authorization mechanisms in a few days, and that was using a new language and a new web framework in the bargain. Once you see how one works, it becomes a lot easier to understand the others as they all work on the same basic strategy. Also, there are open-source client libraries in many languages that simplify the developers job. Although quite frankly, I wrote the Google auth code making straight HTTP calls. I can&#039;t imagine OAuth is that much more complicated.

I think the larger issue here is that Twitter has a moral obligation to at least try to provide whatever protection it can to its users&#039; identities. The argument of &quot;if you don&#039;t like it don&#039;t use it&quot; is simply cavalier. People are using this service for more than just talking about what they had for breakfast. Twitter has a responsibility to their users and they ought to step up and fulfill it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t buy the &#8220;developers would have a lot of trouble understanding it&#8221; argument. Yes, it&#8217;s more involved than Simple Authentication but I was able to implement a web app client using the Flickr and Google authorization mechanisms in a few days, and that was using a new language and a new web framework in the bargain. Once you see how one works, it becomes a lot easier to understand the others as they all work on the same basic strategy. Also, there are open-source client libraries in many languages that simplify the developers job. Although quite frankly, I wrote the Google auth code making straight HTTP calls. I can&#8217;t imagine OAuth is that much more complicated.</p>
<p>I think the larger issue here is that Twitter has a moral obligation to at least try to provide whatever protection it can to its users&#8217; identities. The argument of &#8220;if you don&#8217;t like it don&#8217;t use it&#8221; is simply cavalier. People are using this service for more than just talking about what they had for breakfast. Twitter has a responsibility to their users and they ought to step up and fulfill it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
