<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My name is not a URL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/03/21/my-name-is-not-a-url/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/03/21/my-name-is-not-a-url/</link>
	<description>This can all be made better. Ready? Begin.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:50:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capri</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/03/21/my-name-is-not-a-url/comment-page-2/#comment-118434</link>
		<dc:creator>Capri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1276#comment-118434</guid>
		<description>Again, it isn&#039;t &quot;vanity&quot; to have a url with your name/handle in it instead of a bunch of numbers! One thing I&#039;ve always disliked about Facebook is they require you to use your full name, which is why, regardless of what my url is there (and I&#039;m not vain BTW) I don&#039;t even give it out to anyone... They&#039;re not &quot;vanity&quot; urls, they are &quot;username urls&quot;..........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, it isn&#8217;t &#8220;vanity&#8221; to have a url with your name/handle in it instead of a bunch of numbers! One thing I&#8217;ve always disliked about Facebook is they require you to use your full name, which is why, regardless of what my url is there (and I&#8217;m not vain BTW) I don&#8217;t even give it out to anyone&#8230; They&#8217;re not &#8220;vanity&#8221; urls, they are &#8220;username urls&#8221;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob G.</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/03/21/my-name-is-not-a-url/comment-page-2/#comment-118429</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 04:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1276#comment-118429</guid>
		<description>I agree with the whole &quot;vanity&quot; issue is really for those that need it.  My thing is that the growth of these so called &quot;social&quot; networks is paramount to the numbing of our senses in the 1950&#039;s and 1960&#039;s with TV.  I in fact believe we are becoming less &quot;social&quot; as a society with each passing generation.  Go outside and have a cold beer with the neighbor sometime!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the whole &#8220;vanity&#8221; issue is really for those that need it.  My thing is that the growth of these so called &#8220;social&#8221; networks is paramount to the numbing of our senses in the 1950&#8242;s and 1960&#8242;s with TV.  I in fact believe we are becoming less &#8220;social&#8221; as a society with each passing generation.  Go outside and have a cold beer with the neighbor sometime!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Petersen</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/03/21/my-name-is-not-a-url/comment-page-2/#comment-117941</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 04:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1276#comment-117941</guid>
		<description>@Fred: I 100% agree with you on this. I have *several* real lives and I consider this to be very legitimate. 

I&#039;m a web master of a large forum and the members know me as, well, a ruthless dictator and tyrant. It&#039;s part of the job when you need to be judge and executioner and at time force people to do what you want them to do. To them, I&#039;m an Oz-like figure and that suits me well.

In &quot;real life&quot; I&#039;m not that person at all. These are two entirely different &quot;people&quot;, characters or roles I play and each has they own social network and each their own separate identities.

I am NOT a fan of social networks for one simple reason: social identities are uni-dimensional, singular and absolute. The full depth of my social identity doesn&#039;t begin to encompass the full scope of my personality or my identiy. I&#039;m not the same person to all people and I don&#039;t share all of my life with all of my friends (real or otherwise).

I don&#039;t want my grandmother or my niece knowing &quot;I&#039;m a fan of Whips and Chains&quot; or my boss knowing I f***ed off from work early because it was too nice a day to waste it inside or that he&#039;s an imbecile even if I choose to tell my S&amp;M friends I think so.

The idea that you can capture the entire identity of a person in a single place is false logic and even if you could I would consider that yo be a gross violation of my person and my privacy and no, I don&#039;t trust that Facebook or Google or whoever you choose will keep my secrets secret.

I don&#039;t like having my real name associated with my facebook profile and that is why I limit my facebook friends to only a handful. If your Facebook profile is all you are then I probably wouldn&#039;t want to be your friend anyway.

&quot;If Relationship George walks through that door, he will kill Independent George! A George divided against itself, cannot stand!&quot;

I don&#039;t think social networking, facebook in particular, is the panacea people claim it to be because it doesn&#039;t deliver on what it promises which is a singular, uni-dimensional profile of a multi-dimensional, dynamic and complex human animal. If they did I wouldn&#039;t go anywhere near them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Fred: I 100% agree with you on this. I have *several* real lives and I consider this to be very legitimate. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m a web master of a large forum and the members know me as, well, a ruthless dictator and tyrant. It&#8217;s part of the job when you need to be judge and executioner and at time force people to do what you want them to do. To them, I&#8217;m an Oz-like figure and that suits me well.</p>
<p>In &#8220;real life&#8221; I&#8217;m not that person at all. These are two entirely different &#8220;people&#8221;, characters or roles I play and each has they own social network and each their own separate identities.</p>
<p>I am NOT a fan of social networks for one simple reason: social identities are uni-dimensional, singular and absolute. The full depth of my social identity doesn&#8217;t begin to encompass the full scope of my personality or my identiy. I&#8217;m not the same person to all people and I don&#8217;t share all of my life with all of my friends (real or otherwise).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want my grandmother or my niece knowing &#8220;I&#8217;m a fan of Whips and Chains&#8221; or my boss knowing I f***ed off from work early because it was too nice a day to waste it inside or that he&#8217;s an imbecile even if I choose to tell my S&amp;M friends I think so.</p>
<p>The idea that you can capture the entire identity of a person in a single place is false logic and even if you could I would consider that yo be a gross violation of my person and my privacy and no, I don&#8217;t trust that Facebook or Google or whoever you choose will keep my secrets secret.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like having my real name associated with my facebook profile and that is why I limit my facebook friends to only a handful. If your Facebook profile is all you are then I probably wouldn&#8217;t want to be your friend anyway.</p>
<p>&#8220;If Relationship George walks through that door, he will kill Independent George! A George divided against itself, cannot stand!&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think social networking, facebook in particular, is the panacea people claim it to be because it doesn&#8217;t deliver on what it promises which is a singular, uni-dimensional profile of a multi-dimensional, dynamic and complex human animal. If they did I wouldn&#8217;t go anywhere near them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some links for light reading (24/3/09) &#171; Max Design</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/03/21/my-name-is-not-a-url/comment-page-2/#comment-117021</link>
		<dc:creator>Some links for light reading (24/3/09) &#171; Max Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1276#comment-117021</guid>
		<description>[...] My name is not a URL [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My name is not a URL [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capri</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/03/21/my-name-is-not-a-url/comment-page-2/#comment-110259</link>
		<dc:creator>Capri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1276#comment-110259</guid>
		<description>Once again, they are NOT &quot;vanity urls&quot; You&#039;re not vain for using a name/handle as an url and people just keep using that insulting term as if it was nothing. Yes, there are concerns about privacy online, people can and do misuse personal information - addresses, phone numbers, first and last names, locations to harass others online, and this includes bullying, stalking, blackklisting whoever the victim of the hate campaign is. That&#039;s why I prefer not to use my full name or give it out unless I have no choice. But that doesn&#039;t make me vain for wanting to use a handle in an url instead of a bunch of random numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, they are NOT &#8220;vanity urls&#8221; You&#8217;re not vain for using a name/handle as an url and people just keep using that insulting term as if it was nothing. Yes, there are concerns about privacy online, people can and do misuse personal information &#8211; addresses, phone numbers, first and last names, locations to harass others online, and this includes bullying, stalking, blackklisting whoever the victim of the hate campaign is. That&#8217;s why I prefer not to use my full name or give it out unless I have no choice. But that doesn&#8217;t make me vain for wanting to use a handle in an url instead of a bunch of random numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Nel</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/03/21/my-name-is-not-a-url/comment-page-2/#comment-110254</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Nel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1276#comment-110254</guid>
		<description>The one thing I always get concerned about when talking about Web 2.0 and like you mentioned, the search engines that should be capable of knowing where you are, where you were, where your friends were etc... is that it&#039;s exactly that! The search engines (aka Google as they seem to be slowly taking over the world) will then know even more about you.

To continue, the problem with that is the ridiculous amount of power that will be had with that type of information. I already felt strange about my twitter account being my name... but like you also mentioned, it allows for a transparency that is necessary in the social realms that Twitter and Facebook calls home.

It&#039;s not that I&#039;m a conspiracy nut or anything like that, I just value my privacy a lot and would rather avoid the social network completely instead of getting the &quot;forced privilege&quot; to have my name in some vanity URL.

Great post, great read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one thing I always get concerned about when talking about Web 2.0 and like you mentioned, the search engines that should be capable of knowing where you are, where you were, where your friends were etc&#8230; is that it&#8217;s exactly that! The search engines (aka Google as they seem to be slowly taking over the world) will then know even more about you.</p>
<p>To continue, the problem with that is the ridiculous amount of power that will be had with that type of information. I already felt strange about my twitter account being my name&#8230; but like you also mentioned, it allows for a transparency that is necessary in the social realms that Twitter and Facebook calls home.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that I&#8217;m a conspiracy nut or anything like that, I just value my privacy a lot and would rather avoid the social network completely instead of getting the &#8220;forced privilege&#8221; to have my name in some vanity URL.</p>
<p>Great post, great read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/03/21/my-name-is-not-a-url/comment-page-2/#comment-109380</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 09:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1276#comment-109380</guid>
		<description>I want to be an URL IRL :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to be an URL IRL <img src='http://factoryjoe.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obviouschild</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/03/21/my-name-is-not-a-url/comment-page-2/#comment-109308</link>
		<dc:creator>Obviouschild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1276#comment-109308</guid>
		<description>I agree; I don&#039;t like the idea that I would have to always update anything in order to &#039;sell myself&#039; and my image and compete to have the &#039;coolest&#039; page and so forth.  My personality is in the real world, no hiding in the ether...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree; I don&#8217;t like the idea that I would have to always update anything in order to &#8216;sell myself&#8217; and my image and compete to have the &#8216;coolest&#8217; page and so forth.  My personality is in the real world, no hiding in the ether&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capri</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/03/21/my-name-is-not-a-url/comment-page-2/#comment-105752</link>
		<dc:creator>Capri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 03:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1276#comment-105752</guid>
		<description>I never said I &quot;relied&quot; on Facebook for anything, my point is to protest the use of the insulting term &quot;vanity url&quot;. I&#039;d like an easier url. I am not vain. That&#039;s my point...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never said I &#8220;relied&#8221; on Facebook for anything, my point is to protest the use of the insulting term &#8220;vanity url&#8221;. I&#8217;d like an easier url. I am not vain. That&#8217;s my point&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Zeats</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/03/21/my-name-is-not-a-url/comment-page-1/#comment-105750</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Zeats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 02:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1276#comment-105750</guid>
		<description>Capri: If you are RELYING on Facebook in anyway then you are being foolish because if FaceBook loses (or deletes) your data, you have no recourse unless you are famous enough to get your issue into the media. As I said, Facebook is a capricious company.

Capricious: prone to irrational and unpredictable changes in mood and behavior.  

Sounds like Facebook to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Capri: If you are RELYING on Facebook in anyway then you are being foolish because if FaceBook loses (or deletes) your data, you have no recourse unless you are famous enough to get your issue into the media. As I said, Facebook is a capricious company.</p>
<p>Capricious: prone to irrational and unpredictable changes in mood and behavior.  </p>
<p>Sounds like Facebook to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

