<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The death of the URL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/11/16/the-death-of-the-url/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/11/16/the-death-of-the-url/</link>
	<description>This can all be made better. Ready? Begin.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:26:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Designing for the gut - SxDSalon: A group blog on social interaction design</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/11/16/the-death-of-the-url/comment-page-2/#comment-117276</link>
		<dc:creator>Designing for the gut - SxDSalon: A group blog on social interaction design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1791#comment-117276</guid>
		<description>[...] writing about the death of the URL, I wanted to expose some consequences of this division. While the intellectually adventuresome are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] writing about the death of the URL, I wanted to expose some consequences of this division. While the intellectually adventuresome are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Die wunderbare Welt von Isotopp</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/11/16/the-death-of-the-url/comment-page-2/#comment-117097</link>
		<dc:creator>Die wunderbare Welt von Isotopp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1791#comment-117097</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Der Tod der URL...&lt;/strong&gt;

In meinem Kampf gegen mein Backlog bin ich nun schon immerhin im November letzten Jahres angekommen: Damals schrieb Chris Messina über The Death Of The URL. Er analysiert, wie verschiedene Inkarnationen des Webfernsehens wie tatsächliche Webfernseher, ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Der Tod der URL&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>In meinem Kampf gegen mein Backlog bin ich nun schon immerhin im November letzten Jahres angekommen: Damals schrieb Chris Messina über The Death Of The URL. Er analysiert, wie verschiedene Inkarnationen des Webfernsehens wie tatsächliche Webfernseher, &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newman Library Idea Lab &#187; Tech Sharecase, 29 January 2010</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/11/16/the-death-of-the-url/comment-page-2/#comment-117024</link>
		<dc:creator>Newman Library Idea Lab &#187; Tech Sharecase, 29 January 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1791#comment-117024</guid>
		<description>[...] device as being too locked down, filled with DRM restrictions, and further the use of apps, which some view as a problematic development that signals an effort to return to walled gardens of the web of the early 1990s. The device seems [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] device as being too locked down, filled with DRM restrictions, and further the use of apps, which some view as a problematic development that signals an effort to return to walled gardens of the web of the early 1990s. The device seems [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Web in Danger &#124; BlogHalt.com (Pre-Launch)</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/11/16/the-death-of-the-url/comment-page-2/#comment-116993</link>
		<dc:creator>The Web in Danger &#124; BlogHalt.com (Pre-Launch)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1791#comment-116993</guid>
		<description>[...] Chris Messina, The Death of the URL: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chris Messina, The Death of the URL: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Web in Danger &#124; BlogHalt.com</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/11/16/the-death-of-the-url/comment-page-2/#comment-116968</link>
		<dc:creator>The Web in Danger &#124; BlogHalt.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1791#comment-116968</guid>
		<description>[...] Chris Messina, The Death of the URL: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chris Messina, The Death of the URL: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LKRaider</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/11/16/the-death-of-the-url/comment-page-2/#comment-116581</link>
		<dc:creator>LKRaider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1791#comment-116581</guid>
		<description>A technical note: We need devices to have static ipv6 assigned to them, so we can reference globally without intermediaries (dns, etc), then we can see a return to self-publishing services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A technical note: We need devices to have static ipv6 assigned to them, so we can reference globally without intermediaries (dns, etc), then we can see a return to self-publishing services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Montana Flynn</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/11/16/the-death-of-the-url/comment-page-2/#comment-114437</link>
		<dc:creator>Montana Flynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1791#comment-114437</guid>
		<description>Great post, it really opened my eyes.   I really appreciate the links an time you put into this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, it really opened my eyes.   I really appreciate the links an time you put into this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: litl_phil</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/11/16/the-death-of-the-url/comment-page-2/#comment-114435</link>
		<dc:creator>litl_phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 20:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1791#comment-114435</guid>
		<description>Hi, I work with litl.  We&#039;d disagree strongly that our UI takes away any freedom to surf - you can just type urls into our interface like on any browser and go there.  And we don&#039;t have any plans at all to try to kill that or to restrict access to searches as far as I am aware nor can I imagine why we would do that.

We freely admit that we take inspiration in easel mode from the metaphor of the TV and agree that people need a web appliance but by the same token we are still a webbook and work like one in laptop mode.  What we do have plans to do is expand our offerings of litl channels - these don&#039;t restrict targeted web services and content either but do customize the interface to these so that these slide effortlessly into our UI and usability model.  We&#039;re also releasing an SDK soon so people can build their own channels. We won&#039;t seek to overly control what can go through a litl channel only the interface to it.  And you can still go straight to web pages.  I&#039;ve participated in or sat in on many high level discussions at litl and I&#039;ve never once heard any mention of us trying to strangle or unduly manipulate user&#039;s url choices.  We do offer our suggestions for sites, streams and webapps and we don&#039;t necessarily get any direct benefit from those.  Watch http://blog.litl.com for new channel announcements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I work with litl.  We&#8217;d disagree strongly that our UI takes away any freedom to surf &#8211; you can just type urls into our interface like on any browser and go there.  And we don&#8217;t have any plans at all to try to kill that or to restrict access to searches as far as I am aware nor can I imagine why we would do that.</p>
<p>We freely admit that we take inspiration in easel mode from the metaphor of the TV and agree that people need a web appliance but by the same token we are still a webbook and work like one in laptop mode.  What we do have plans to do is expand our offerings of litl channels &#8211; these don&#8217;t restrict targeted web services and content either but do customize the interface to these so that these slide effortlessly into our UI and usability model.  We&#8217;re also releasing an SDK soon so people can build their own channels. We won&#8217;t seek to overly control what can go through a litl channel only the interface to it.  And you can still go straight to web pages.  I&#8217;ve participated in or sat in on many high level discussions at litl and I&#8217;ve never once heard any mention of us trying to strangle or unduly manipulate user&#8217;s url choices.  We do offer our suggestions for sites, streams and webapps and we don&#8217;t necessarily get any direct benefit from those.  Watch <a href="http://blog.litl.com" rel="nofollow">http://blog.litl.com</a> for new channel announcements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Webmechs Press &#187; Microsoft should replace IE with a CoreCLR-based browser</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/11/16/the-death-of-the-url/comment-page-2/#comment-114419</link>
		<dc:creator>The Webmechs Press &#187; Microsoft should replace IE with a CoreCLR-based browser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1791#comment-114419</guid>
		<description>[...] In this other blog post, the author explains why end-users RIAs, among other things destroy some of what is good about the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In this other blog post, the author explains why end-users RIAs, among other things destroy some of what is good about the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth Robinson</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/11/16/the-death-of-the-url/comment-page-2/#comment-114416</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 13:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1791#comment-114416</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s important to be concerned about such things. It certainly wasn&#039;t a trend I&#039;d paid attention to, so I appreciate the heads up.

However, I expect that it&#039;s primarily a manifestation of the technology adoption lifecycle. There will always be people working and living in the early adopters phase. There will always be kids and adults who don&#039;t want to do just what is presented them and will go find out how to do the rest. And there will always be people who are content otherwise.

The existence of libraries and bookstores is side by side with the large percentage of adults who never read a book all the way through after they&#039;ve completed school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s important to be concerned about such things. It certainly wasn&#8217;t a trend I&#8217;d paid attention to, so I appreciate the heads up.</p>
<p>However, I expect that it&#8217;s primarily a manifestation of the technology adoption lifecycle. There will always be people working and living in the early adopters phase. There will always be kids and adults who don&#8217;t want to do just what is presented them and will go find out how to do the rest. And there will always be people who are content otherwise.</p>
<p>The existence of libraries and bookstores is side by side with the large percentage of adults who never read a book all the way through after they&#8217;ve completed school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
