<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clarifying my comments on Twitter&#8217;s annotations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2010/06/21/comments-on-twitter-annotations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2010/06/21/comments-on-twitter-annotations/</link>
	<description>This can all be made better. Ready? Begin.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:32:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Bertil Hatt</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2010/06/21/comments-on-twitter-annotations/comment-page-1/#comment-118344</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertil Hatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 02:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1933#comment-118344</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure about paving, but what actually matters is people agreeing; twitter will publish stats, so this should apply (and all disagreements will become different objects):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focal_point_(game_theory)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure about paving, but what actually matters is people agreeing; twitter will publish stats, so this should apply (and all disagreements will become different objects):<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focal_point_(game_theory)" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focal_point_(game_theory)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertil Hatt</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2010/06/21/comments-on-twitter-annotations/comment-page-1/#comment-118342</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertil Hatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 19:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1933#comment-118342</guid>
		<description>Great, &#039;cause that statement was so not like you — if anyone believes in the invisible hand auto-paving catpaths… Anyway: why no twitter client has a simple, negative hashtag-filter yet? TweetDeck does it? Ok, so why no *nice looking* client has it then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, &#8217;cause that statement was so not like you — if anyone believes in the invisible hand auto-paving catpaths… Anyway: why no twitter client has a simple, negative hashtag-filter yet? TweetDeck does it? Ok, so why no *nice looking* client has it then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Mison</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2010/06/21/comments-on-twitter-annotations/comment-page-1/#comment-118320</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 22:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1933#comment-118320</guid>
		<description>I was lucky enough to be at Warble, a hackday for Twitter-using European developers who didn&#039;t get to Chirp, where Raffi Krikorian, one of their lead devs, gave a talk on annotations; his blog has slides and video: http://mehack.com/extremely-preliminary-look-at-twitters-annota

He noted that there would, at launch, be an explorer, allowing you to look up most-used annotations, and a wiki, for saying what type names developers were using. Both of these should, if developers use them, help to allay fears of an incompatible free for all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was lucky enough to be at Warble, a hackday for Twitter-using European developers who didn&#8217;t get to Chirp, where Raffi Krikorian, one of their lead devs, gave a talk on annotations; his blog has slides and video: <a href="http://mehack.com/extremely-preliminary-look-at-twitters-annota" rel="nofollow">http://mehack.com/extremely-preliminary-look-at-twitters-annota</a></p>
<p>He noted that there would, at launch, be an explorer, allowing you to look up most-used annotations, and a wiki, for saying what type names developers were using. Both of these should, if developers use them, help to allay fears of an incompatible free for all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Essel</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2010/06/21/comments-on-twitter-annotations/comment-page-1/#comment-118318</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Essel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 20:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1933#comment-118318</guid>
		<description>Appreciate the rapid response and clarification Chris. Hope to hear that you revisit the conversation about activity streams and twitter again soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appreciate the rapid response and clarification Chris. Hope to hear that you revisit the conversation about activity streams and twitter again soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

