<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FactoryCity &#187; Tumblelog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://factoryjoe.com/blog/category/tumblelog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog</link>
	<description>This can all be made better. Ready? Begin.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:16:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>A status update from 1940</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/11/23/a-status-update-from-1940/</link>
		<comments>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/11/23/a-status-update-from-1940/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Messina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society & economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumblelog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[status updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sxd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trim:key=fj_1940]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brynn and I went poking around Alemeda this weekend and stumbled into Pauline&#8217;s Antiques, the kind of place where you can find thick-walled whiskey glasses that were once sipped from by people who wore yellow sweaters unironically. Of course, you can find such yellow sweaters too, but what caught our attention were the unremarkable postcards [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://brynnevans.com">Brynn</a> and I went poking around Alemeda this weekend and stumbled into <a href="http://paulinesantiques.com">Pauline&#8217;s Antiques</a>, the kind of place where you can find thick-walled whiskey glasses that were once sipped from by people who wore yellow sweaters unironically. Of course, you can find such yellow sweaters too, but what caught our attention were the unremarkable postcards scattered around the store reminiscent of a simpler time.</p>
<p>But one must ask himself: was it <em>really</em> so different then?</p>
<p>Superficially of course it certainly seems to like things are quite different from back then: faster, bigger, and more connected for starters.</p>
<p>The hallmark of this change, it would seem, is the simple status update. As more people have taken to publishing online, we the group <em>formerly known as the audience</em> has invariably gravitated to consuming smaller and smaller bits of content, leading to a culture of <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/jyri/snack-size-sociality">snack-sized sociality</a>. For many of us, the status update seems distinctly modern — a sign of the times, cut from the networked medium of the age:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/factoryjoe/4130188172/" title="Status Update from 1940 by factoryjoe, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2656/4130188172_d3ae38ea3f.jpg" width="500" height="318" class="figure figure-a" alt="Status Update from 1940" /></a></p>
<p>But hold on. Take a closer look there.</p>
<p>That tweet above? It&#8217;s a <em>fake</em>. It&#8217;s photoshopped. I took that content from one of those postcards I found in Pauline&#8217;s shop. <strong>It was post stamped in 1940</strong>:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/factoryjoe/4130171438/" title="Postcard Back by factoryjoe, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2608/4130171438_657f497b06.jpg" width="500" height="305" alt="Postcard Back" class="figure-a" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/factoryjoe/4130171362/" title="Postcard Front by factoryjoe, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2589/4130171362_02e409838f.jpg" width="500" height="303" alt="Postcard Front" class="figure-a" /></a></p>
<p>Just goes to show that the more things appear to change, the more we prove what habitual creatures we are. </p>
<p>&#8230;Though I don&#8217;t doubt Miss Phyllis Epstein&#8217;s reply was terse, I reckon she was ever able to reply quite so immediately:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/factoryjoe/4130235182/" title="@reply by factoryjoe, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2661/4130235182_9a2b1a86fe.jpg" width="500" height="222" alt="@reply" class="figure figure-a" /></a></p>
<p>So maybe the drive to communicate, coordinate, and group hasn&#8217;t changed much, but perhaps our ability to do so quickly, cheaply, and at an unprecedented scale has? It&#8217;s surely no surprise, but <em>only time will tell</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/11/23/a-status-update-from-1940/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Words and actions</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/09/07/words-and-actions/</link>
		<comments>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/09/07/words-and-actions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 17:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Messina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Raw Materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumblelog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indexed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jessica hagy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Original by Jessica Hagy (@jessicahagy). She has a whole book of these called Indexed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/factoryjoe/3896474723/" title="Thisis Indexed Wisdom by factoryjoe, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2480/3896474723_6b22b7bc2d.jpg" width="500" height="325" class="figure figure-a" alt="Thisis Indexed Wisdom" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://thisisindexed.com/2009/09/company-or-companies/">Original</a> by Jessica Hagy (@<a href="http://twitter.com/jessicahagy">jessicahagy</a>). She has a whole book of these called <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0142005207?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=factorycity-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=0142005207">Indexed</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/09/07/words-and-actions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8212;</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/09/07/661/</link>
		<comments>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/09/07/661/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 17:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Messina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumblelog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/09/07/661/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever danced with your software? If Windows, Linux, Ubuntu or Mac OSX were dance partners, how would they dance? Would they lead, or would you? More importantly, would you accept a second dance if any one of them offered?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever <em>danced</em> with your software?</p>
<p>If Windows, Linux, Ubuntu or Mac OSX were dance partners, how would they dance? Would they lead, or would you?</p>
<p>More importantly, would you accept a second dance if any one of them offered?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/09/07/661/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8212;</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/08/07/593/</link>
		<comments>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/08/07/593/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 07:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Messina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumblelog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Untitled, unfinished, incomplete]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/08/07/593/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I bet you could recast the whole Greeks vs Romans civilization clash as something very nearly resembling today&#8217;s Windows vs Mac relationship. There seems to be the Trojan horse (when Gates invested in Apple) and now, with OSX essentially cannibalizing Windows applications, we&#8217;re seeing the story come full circle (I certainly don&#8217;t see the visually [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet you could recast the whole <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romans_and_Greeks">Greeks vs Romans</a> civilization clash as something very nearly resembling today&#8217;s Windows vs Mac relationship. There seems to be the Trojan horse (when <a href="http://news.com.com/MS+to+invest+150+million+in+Apple/2100-1001_3-202143.html">Gates invested in Apple</a>) and now, with <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/">OSX</a> essentially cannibalizing Windows applications, we&#8217;re seeing the story come full circle (I certainly don&#8217;t see the visually superior Mac apps running on the PC anytime soon). Fascinating to see history repeating itself yet again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/08/07/593/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8212;</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/08/04/589/</link>
		<comments>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/08/04/589/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 21:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Messina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumblelog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/08/04/589/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;don&#8217;t look now, but sooner or later you&#8217;ll be able to run Windows applications right from within your Intel Mac&#8217;s OS. At one point, this wasn&#8217;t exactly obvious. Fortunately, the independent market can respond faster than the stalwarts. Whether they&#8217;ll be cannibalized later on remains to be seen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;don&#8217;t look now, but <a href="http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/08/03/cider/index.php">sooner</a> or <a href="http://www.codeweavers.com/products/cxmac/">later</a> you&#8217;ll be able to <a href="http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/08/03/cider/index.php">run Windows applications right from within your Intel Mac&#8217;s OS</a>. At one point, this <a href="http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/04/27/leopard-runs-windows-open/">wasn&#8217;t exactly obvious</a>. Fortunately, the independent market can <a href="http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/06/30/crossover/index.php">respond</a> faster than the <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/bootcamp/">stalwarts</a>. Whether they&#8217;ll be <a href="http://konfabulator.com">cannibalized</a> later on remains to be seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/08/04/589/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8212;</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/07/28/573/</link>
		<comments>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/07/28/573/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 06:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Messina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Society & economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumblelog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/07/28/573/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Moore&#8217;s law talks about the speed of processors doubling every so often (specifics aren&#8217;t that important at the moment). Invariably, games, apps and whatnot other myriad things come along to suck up that juice necessitating upgrades, new hardware and so on. It&#8217;s essentially a personal issue, however, one that, so long as Moore&#8217;s law [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Moore&#8217;s law talks about the speed of processors doubling every so often (specifics aren&#8217;t that important at the moment). Invariably, games, apps and whatnot other myriad things come along to suck up that juice necessitating upgrades, new hardware and so on. It&#8217;s essentially a personal issue, however, one that, so long as Moore&#8217;s law stays unbroken, you can overcome it by buying or upgrading your computer or being conservative about the technology you use.</p>
<p>The bandwidth problem, however, has no equivalent Moore&#8217;s law. Even as faster wireless standards emerge, the series of tubes that make up the internets aren&#8217;t getting any fatter. And yet more and more race horses, poker chips, blow-up dolls and lottery balls will be being sent thru the tubes the more people go online. And already, at least in the states, our bandwidth is retarded compared to Europe (as in &#8220;being late&#8221; or &#8220;behind&#8221;). So I&#8217;m kinda sittin&#8217; here wonderin&#8217;, y&#8217;know, what&#8217;s the big plan moving forward? Are we just waiting to turn on the dark fiber? If so, turn it on already! If not, ok, what? Lay more fiber? I mean, what&#8217;s to guarentee that, as we rely evermore on the cloud, that the pipes that we rely on to access it are going to be able to bare the burden? I mean car makers don&#8217;t built the roads &#8212; what is our civic interest &#8212; nay, duty &#8212; in making sure that we have unhindered, unthrottled bandwidth into the future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/07/28/573/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8212;</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/07/28/572/</link>
		<comments>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/07/28/572/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 00:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Messina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumblelog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/07/28/572/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone know a good blog editor for the CrackBerry?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone know a good blog editor for the CrackBerry?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/07/28/572/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8212;</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/07/19/559/</link>
		<comments>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/07/19/559/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 04:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Messina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tumblelog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/07/19/559/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Y&#8217;know what they should do? They (&#8220;they&#8221; being RIM, the Canadians who make the Crackberry I&#8217;m writing this post with) should add gyroscopic scensors to Crackberries so that I can just &#8220;roooollll&#8221; my Crackberry side to side to scroll sideways and up and down. Then, like an Etch-a-Sketch&#038;trade, I should be able to shake it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y&#8217;know what they should do? They (&#8220;they&#8221; being RIM, the Canadians who make the Crackberry I&#8217;m writing this post with) should add gyroscopic scensors to Crackberries so that I can just &#8220;roooollll&#8221; my Crackberry side to side to scroll sideways and up and down. Then, like an Etch-a-Sketch&#038;trade, I should be able to shake it to clear the form field that I&#8217;m in. </p>
<p>Yup, they should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/07/19/559/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8212;</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/07/19/557/</link>
		<comments>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/07/19/557/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Messina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tumblelog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/07/19/557/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s no reason why the of future of travel sites can&#8217;t include a service like CanICrash.org. I mean, they&#8217;re in the business of travel, right? Maybe I *don&#8217;t* want to stay at hotels but with people I know (or who know me). Ignoring the obvious naivete quotient on this concept, why can&#8217;t I, when I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no reason why the of future of travel sites can&#8217;t include a service like CanICrash.org. I mean, they&#8217;re in the business of travel, right? Maybe I *don&#8217;t* want to stay at hotels but with people I know (or who know me). Ignoring the obvious naivete quotient on this concept, why can&#8217;t I, when I book a flight, also send out an email to my remote friends and create an instant blog post announcing my travel plans and need for housing?</p>
<p>Speaking of, Tara and I are looking for digs in North Carolina this weekend and Boston the week of August 4. <img src='http://factoryjoe.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/07/19/557/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8212;</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/07/16/553/</link>
		<comments>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/07/16/553/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2006 20:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Messina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tumblelog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/07/16/553/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want the ultimate away message. I want to communicate my presence (or lack thereof) selectively, openly, or to whomever, across multiple media and networks, from wherever, whenever, to accelerate serendipity and study my own being-around habits. Crossing up twttr, dodgeball, plazes, AOLIM, skype, blackberry is logically and practically only the beginning.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want the ultimate away message. I want to communicate my presence (or lack thereof) selectively, openly, or to whomever, across multiple media and networks, from wherever, whenever, to accelerate serendipity and study my own being-around habits. Crossing up twttr, dodgeball, plazes, AOLIM, skype, blackberry is logically and practically only the beginning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/07/16/553/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

