<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for FactoryCity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://factoryjoe.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog</link>
	<description>This can all be made better. Ready? Begin.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:41:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The social agent, part 4: Share by sabret00the</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2010/03/18/the-social-agent-part-4-share/comment-page-1/#comment-117769</link>
		<dc:creator>sabret00the</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1886#comment-117769</guid>
		<description>Absolutely loving this, amazing work. What is the chance of this being implemented and when by? I mean just how much of a concept is this? Are we likely to be using this functionality by Firefox 4? Even in extension form?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely loving this, amazing work. What is the chance of this being implemented and when by? I mean just how much of a concept is this? Are we likely to be using this functionality by Firefox 4? Even in extension form?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on Opera Unite by digigenocide</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/06/16/thoughts-on-opera-unite/comment-page-2/#comment-117767</link>
		<dc:creator>digigenocide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1498#comment-117767</guid>
		<description>I really dont see how opera&#039;s trying to take on services like facebook, flicker, etc with UNITE. Unite really doesnt fit that bill. Unite is more of an attack on hardware like the pogoplug, basically giving u an easy to set up server for you files using what u already have.  I only wish there were some better apps for it. the only ones that are of any use are the Media Player, Stream video, and the File sharing. Only big down side is Unite closes when opera closes.So Opera has to running all the time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really dont see how opera&#8217;s trying to take on services like facebook, flicker, etc with UNITE. Unite really doesnt fit that bill. Unite is more of an attack on hardware like the pogoplug, basically giving u an easy to set up server for you files using what u already have.  I only wish there were some better apps for it. the only ones that are of any use are the Media Player, Stream video, and the File sharing. Only big down side is Unite closes when opera closes.So Opera has to running all the time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The social agent, part 4: Share by Chris Messina</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2010/03/18/the-social-agent-part-4-share/comment-page-1/#comment-117760</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Messina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1886#comment-117760</guid>
		<description>While they&#039;ve been done as browser extensions and bookmarklets, eventually you realize that the lack of ubiquity of a certain verb in a UI is what&#039;s hold back innovation — because web apps can&#039;t focus on more pressing issues, rather than how many sharing chicklets they have on their site. Furthermore, the presence of such extensions indicate that perhaps this is functionality that SHOULD be made native — rather than ducttaped on after the fact.

I get your points about the &quot;Mail This&quot; functionality, and wouldn&#039;t want it to go away per se. In fact, if you look at the dialog, you can see that email would still be a first class citizen for addressing people in the browser.

Still, for folks who use other channels more often than email, there needs to be smoother integration. Currently the way you tweet or send a Facebook message is janky at best — undiscoverable at worst. If you sign in to your cloud provider, all of your message-sending settings are automatically imported — no need to ever fiddle with SMTP or IMAP again.

It may also be true that the social agent I&#039;ve described isn&#039;t for everyone — but I imagine if I gave this kind of experience to my less-techy friends, they&#039;d probably appreciate how easy it would be to get up and running and just use the thing, rather than futzing with settings that they never need (or don&#039;t understand).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While they&#8217;ve been done as browser extensions and bookmarklets, eventually you realize that the lack of ubiquity of a certain verb in a UI is what&#8217;s hold back innovation — because web apps can&#8217;t focus on more pressing issues, rather than how many sharing chicklets they have on their site. Furthermore, the presence of such extensions indicate that perhaps this is functionality that SHOULD be made native — rather than ducttaped on after the fact.</p>
<p>I get your points about the &#8220;Mail This&#8221; functionality, and wouldn&#8217;t want it to go away per se. In fact, if you look at the dialog, you can see that email would still be a first class citizen for addressing people in the browser.</p>
<p>Still, for folks who use other channels more often than email, there needs to be smoother integration. Currently the way you tweet or send a Facebook message is janky at best — undiscoverable at worst. If you sign in to your cloud provider, all of your message-sending settings are automatically imported — no need to ever fiddle with SMTP or IMAP again.</p>
<p>It may also be true that the social agent I&#8217;ve described isn&#8217;t for everyone — but I imagine if I gave this kind of experience to my less-techy friends, they&#8217;d probably appreciate how easy it would be to get up and running and just use the thing, rather than futzing with settings that they never need (or don&#8217;t understand).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The social agent, part 4: Share by jens</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2010/03/18/the-social-agent-part-4-share/comment-page-1/#comment-117759</link>
		<dc:creator>jens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1886#comment-117759</guid>
		<description>I like this series, but this post lacked oomph. The UI ideas you show have all been done already as browser extensions or bookmarklets. I&#039;m not sure what value there is in hardcoding them in the browser; it would just slow down innovation.

In defense of the &quot;Mail Link To This Page&quot; command: it&#039;s great for sending a link to one specific person. Everyone has email already, even my parents who would never use Twitter or even Facebook. And if I&#039;m going to send email, I want to do it from -- surprise -- my preferred email app, not some browser&#039;s quick-and-dirty dialog box. Would that dialog box support styled text? Would it let me pick from my address book? Would it know what SMTP server to use, or make me configure that yet again in its prefs?  Would it secretly put embarrassing boilerplate in the message like &quot;Your buddy $MYNAME thought you&#039;d get a kick out of this!&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this series, but this post lacked oomph. The UI ideas you show have all been done already as browser extensions or bookmarklets. I&#8217;m not sure what value there is in hardcoding them in the browser; it would just slow down innovation.</p>
<p>In defense of the &#8220;Mail Link To This Page&#8221; command: it&#8217;s great for sending a link to one specific person. Everyone has email already, even my parents who would never use Twitter or even Facebook. And if I&#8217;m going to send email, I want to do it from &#8212; surprise &#8212; my preferred email app, not some browser&#8217;s quick-and-dirty dialog box. Would that dialog box support styled text? Would it let me pick from my address book? Would it know what SMTP server to use, or make me configure that yet again in its prefs?  Would it secretly put embarrassing boilerplate in the message like &#8220;Your buddy $MYNAME thought you&#8217;d get a kick out of this!&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The social agent, part 4: Share by Justin Thorp</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2010/03/18/the-social-agent-part-4-share/comment-page-1/#comment-117756</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Thorp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1886#comment-117756</guid>
		<description>Chris, great post.  Definitely see that sharing will play an important role in the future of the browser.   

With AddThis, almost a year ago, we launched a browser toolbar (http://addthis.com/tools) that enabled sharing of any website to any of the sharing services we support.  

It&#039;s been tremendously successful.  It&#039;s seeing great adoption and ,on average, people with the toolbar share 39x more than someone who shares with the AddThis button. (http://bit.ly/9zsurY)

We&#039;re definitely looking for ways that we can continue to evolve it and add more functionality for our users.  You have a lot great ideas in this post.  We&#039;d be excited to work with anyone who&#039;d like to riff on this topic further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, great post.  Definitely see that sharing will play an important role in the future of the browser.   </p>
<p>With AddThis, almost a year ago, we launched a browser toolbar (<a href="http://addthis.com/tools" rel="nofollow">http://addthis.com/tools</a>) that enabled sharing of any website to any of the sharing services we support.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s been tremendously successful.  It&#8217;s seeing great adoption and ,on average, people with the toolbar share 39x more than someone who shares with the AddThis button. (<a href="http://bit.ly/9zsurY" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9zsurY</a>)</p>
<p>We&#8217;re definitely looking for ways that we can continue to evolve it and add more functionality for our users.  You have a lot great ideas in this post.  We&#8217;d be excited to work with anyone who&#8217;d like to riff on this topic further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The social agent by FactoryCity &#187; The social agent, part 4: Share</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2010/03/11/the-social-agent/comment-page-1/#comment-117755</link>
		<dc:creator>FactoryCity &#187; The social agent, part 4: Share</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1860#comment-117755</guid>
		<description>[...] entries in the concept series include:  Part 1: The Social Agent, Part 2: Connect, and Part 3: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] entries in the concept series include:  Part 1: The Social Agent, Part 2: Connect, and Part 3: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The social agent, part 2: Connect by FactoryCity &#187; The social agent, part 3: Follow</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2010/03/12/the-social-agent-part-2-connect/comment-page-1/#comment-117754</link>
		<dc:creator>FactoryCity &#187; The social agent, part 3: Follow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1868#comment-117754</guid>
		<description>[...] FactoryCity This can all be made better. Ready? Begin.   Skip to content AboutArchivesTagsProjectsLinksScreenshotsContact     &#171; The social agent, part 2: Connect [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FactoryCity This can all be made better. Ready? Begin.   Skip to content AboutArchivesTagsProjectsLinksScreenshotsContact     &laquo; The social agent, part 2: Connect [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The social agent, part 2: Connect by Linkwertig: Panfu, PayPal, Snack Culture, Bruce Sterling » netzwertig.com</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2010/03/12/the-social-agent-part-2-connect/comment-page-1/#comment-117732</link>
		<dc:creator>Linkwertig: Panfu, PayPal, Snack Culture, Bruce Sterling » netzwertig.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1868#comment-117732</guid>
		<description>[...] The social agent, part 2: Connect » The social agent, part 3: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The social agent, part 2: Connect » The social agent, part 3: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The social agent, part 2: Connect by Nat</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2010/03/12/the-social-agent-part-2-connect/comment-page-1/#comment-117716</link>
		<dc:creator>Nat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1868#comment-117716</guid>
		<description>In response to Dmitry, I use six different computers on a regular basis. The reason I use certain tools generally follows three basic guidelines: 1) &quot;How easy is it to get the data I create on this device to all of my other devices&quot; 2) &quot;How well can the data I create be read by the software on other devices (Mac at Work, Linux on Laptop, Windows at Home)&quot; and 3) &quot;How easy is it to use the software&quot;. 

Most solutions to data syncing (such as Dropbox, Firefox Weave, Git) that I enjoy follow a distributed mind set. There is an online master server, but all of my clients are kept up to date, and if the server is down, I can use another client as a server until it comes back up. 

As for providers syncing, I do hope we come up with a format that all providers are willing to read and write. Data portability is so important this day and age.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Dmitry, I use six different computers on a regular basis. The reason I use certain tools generally follows three basic guidelines: 1) &#8220;How easy is it to get the data I create on this device to all of my other devices&#8221; 2) &#8220;How well can the data I create be read by the software on other devices (Mac at Work, Linux on Laptop, Windows at Home)&#8221; and 3) &#8220;How easy is it to use the software&#8221;. </p>
<p>Most solutions to data syncing (such as Dropbox, Firefox Weave, Git) that I enjoy follow a distributed mind set. There is an online master server, but all of my clients are kept up to date, and if the server is down, I can use another client as a server until it comes back up. </p>
<p>As for providers syncing, I do hope we come up with a format that all providers are willing to read and write. Data portability is so important this day and age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The social agent by perMicah &#124; Mozilla UI Concept Series &#8211; Flickr set</title>
		<link>http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2010/03/11/the-social-agent/comment-page-1/#comment-117711</link>
		<dc:creator>perMicah &#124; Mozilla UI Concept Series &#8211; Flickr set</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://factoryjoe.com/blog/?p=1860#comment-117711</guid>
		<description>[...] Flickr set of concepts for Mozilla done by Factory Joe. Late last fall, from late November through December 2009, I worked with Mozilla Labs to envision [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Flickr set of concepts for Mozilla done by Factory Joe. Late last fall, from late November through December 2009, I worked with Mozilla Labs to envision [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.236 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-20 04:59:20 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->