Dries takes on the old guard

Dries, on meeting with the Flemish Radio- and Television Network (VRT), who will be using Drupal:

I’m going to tell them that traditional media has no choice but to move forward. I spent the last 5 years of my life developing software that enables individuals to publish and share content on the internet. Soon, amateur content providers will have very powerful tools to compete with traditional media. I’m going to tell them that we are reshaping the future of news, information and journalism, and that, if they want to avoid getting left behind, they have to position themselves at the forefront of citizen journalism, take part in it, and embrace new internet technologies.

Are Democrats annoying?

From the “unsubscribed mailing list archive”… or, “If you don’t like to read about politics, don’t waste your time on this post.”

Give'em Hell Harry

Some time ago, I’d signed up for a bunch of Democrat mailing lists… Y’know, MoveOn, Dean for America… some others. At some point the newsletters became less relevant and less interesting, so instead of unsubscribing, I’d just delete them as they arrived. No big sweat off my back.

But I decided to open one of their missives today today titled “Getting Even”. Here’s what it said:

They are not going to get away with it. I am not going to take the lies that Republicans are telling about me and other Democrats in Congress sitting down. And neither should you.

What our opponents are trying to do to me is just a taste of what they have in store for us in the months ahead. Karl Rove’s Republican Party will stoop to any level to smear our candidates, and it certainly won’t let the facts get in the way.

But we won’t get mad. We’re going to get even.

Ok, so, the next thing I did was find the unsubscribe link:

Give'em Hell Harry unsubscribed

The thing is this. I can’t stand 98% of politics today. I especially can’t stand the cry-baby tactics of the Democrats. The Republicans are generally deplorable, but that almost makes them tolerable. The Democrats, on the other hand, have for some time seemed so feeble and self-loathing (not to mention disorganized) that I’ve all but lost faith in the one-and-an-eighth party system. It’s like, why don’t you guys just join up with the Republicans and make way for a full-bodied, more filling second party?

I dunno, maybe I shouldn’t be so harsh, but I’ll tell you what, the Republicans don’t whine nearly as bad as the Dems. Sure, they gripe and they lie and they cheat and steal and they do terrible things — but that’s what politics are all about. In fact, they’re willing to publicly take down their own members if it’ll serve the cause (unless the nickname of the member in question rhymes with “Dummy”). The Democrats, on the other hand, seem to think that fighting fair is American or something — and that they should be treated with dignity and esteem. Just like the folks at Abu Ghraib or Gitmo.

Ahem. Let’s start somewhere, mkay? Start treating the folks you need to rely on the way that you want to be treated and then we’ll talk. Stop treating me like an uninformed ATM. I don’t want to give you any more money and I don’t care about your fundraising efforts. Gas prices are still up, remember? Until you come around to the fact that I’m not a “constituent” but a normal person (just like you), I’ll be on the lookout for a party that actually gets me and reflects the concerns I have. I want to see radical solutions that reflect new thinking — followed up by execution. And I’m tired of you guys always defining and defending yourselves against the Republicans. It’s annoying.

I’m waiting to see something new, that wasn’t around in the last two elections. Obama seems, on the surface, to be an iota more interesting than the rest of the bunch. Crissakes, he’s a got a MySpace account. But I haven’t really even bothered following him that much. Man, just put George Clooney up against Bush — we’d win for sure. I mean, it worked in California for the Republicans. And heck, despite that debonair attitude and winning smiling, annoying is one thing I’ve never thought of him.

Oh, and to keep this in context… I’m just another citizen in this grand ol’ country concerned about the path we’re on. And I’m voicing my opinion, incomplete, uninformed and probably annoying in and of itself, because I’m tired of deleting pointless mailings from Democrats that I simply can’t bring myself to believe in. Yep, that’s it.

Untitled #2, Incomplete

Someone was telling me how, two years ago, they commented that Google is basically Microsoft 2.0.

Big companies follow a pattern. Evil ensues. Rinse, wash, repeat.

WiFi is a municipal matter. Connectivity should be considered a public good.

For obvious reasons. Look, I mean, I decided that privacy is bunk a long time ago so it’s not even that that I’m terribly worried about (your privacy is little more than sand between your fingers).

While quality of service is certainly important — and someone like Google, with its oodles of dollars — can probably ensure adequare coverage and uptime, that’s still not the issue. Communities are resilient when left up to their own devices.

I mean, look at Indian traffic (something I experienced firsthand in Bangalore). You wouldn’t think that it’d work — there’s practically no rules — but y’know what? Almost because the drivers are the ones responsible alone for their fate, they pay better attention, drive more cautiously and use their horns for communication instead of anger. It works — and it’s not just because of some kind of pacifist disposition inherit in Indians.

Point is, okay, that Google is interested in behavior. They’ve shown that they’re interested in 1) selling advertisements 2) pleasing their investors. Innovation is a means to an end. None of these things are intrinsically bad. Guns don’t kill people, robots do. Capitalism didn’t ask to become the scourge of our age, but dammit, someone severed the hand of Adam Smith a long time ago.

Anyway, here’re my two beefs du jour with the GoogleNet plan. Equal distribution. I simply don’t believe that privatized systems give a shit about under performing, under represented or unprofitable ventures. Oh yeah, that’s why they have philanthropic arms (yeah, ok, tell me if this makes sense: poison the environment while contributing to the Sierra Club?).

Second issue? Competition. State-sponsored monopolies suck.

Oh, and hell, toss in one point five more: Network Neutrality and the fact that it’s unnecessary. Here’s an alternative plan — just like you can buy your electricity and cable from multiple vendors, I’d like to be able to get my WiFi from the vendor of my choice. With prices falling all the time for the tech, that’s not the problem. Google wants to lock down the market. With technologies like WiMax available and being deployed elsewhere, seriously, we don’t need the Google Machine monopolizing this space.

You remember there was this company that embedded its browser in its OS and was forced to offer alternatives after an extremely costly (to taxpayers) legal battle? Give it 5-10 years and you’ll see a similar battle over embedding one company’s ads and search services in the state-sponored privately-run WiFi network.

But I’m jess sayin.

Wake up, wake up, wake up

Vanity Fair has their first evar Green Issue (guess it’s never too late to go green) and an article you must read. Cliff’s Notes version: “Global warming” is the marketeer’s way of dressing up “oh shit, someday we’re going to be screwed if we don’t deal with this problem TODAY. Katrina’s proves the point; let’s call it like it is: prepare for climate chaos.

These things are new or weird in my world

AT&T - Under Surveillance

Oh, and WineCamp got a website (thanks João Antunes!), I started a Practical Microformats wiki for all you designers out there (now help me build it!) and Tara and I leave for Barcamp Bangalore on Sunday for 8 days.

…and Barcamp San Francisco is happening June 20. Want to help? Good — because we need it!

Where it’s at

Pinko Desktop Wallpaper

Or perhaps where I’ll be at… specifically, tomorrow night. Namely, at Net Squared‘s Net Tuesday event at Varnish Fine Arts. And who will be speaking? Well, my PiC for one… and my ex-boss Zack Rosen of CivicSpace and Adam Frey of Wikispaces (whom I’ve not met but heard great things about).

Not sure about the others, but Tara says she’ll be speaking about:

[convincing] non-profits to Go Pink(o) at Varnish Fine Arts. I’m going to go through some of what you’ve already read here and on the wiki and then apply the theory to non-profit marketing. Personally, I think it’s even more applicable for a not for profit campaign. When you already have an engaged sponsor-base and an enthusiastic army of volunteers, all sorts of beautiful Pinko community messaging can and will happen.

So there ya go. Your Tuesday is now apportioned!

You work for me, now shut the fuck up

Via Zak Greant, Tim Bray lays it down: “As a thought experiment, replace the word ‘blogging’ with ‘email’ or ‘conference presentation’ or ‘teleconference’ or ‘sales presentation’. Or ‘barroom conversation’ for that matter. Quick, quick, you wanna be safe, you better lock all your employees up and never let ’em say anything to anyone!” … “If your employees are going to say stupid things in public, you’ve got a management problem and a policy problem, not a blogging problem.”

News from the Net Squared

From the Net Squared news machine:

Next Tuesday, April 11th, Zack Rosen of CivicSpace, Adam Frey of WikiSpaces, and Tara Hunt, of Riya.com & Horsepigcow, will gather at Varnish for Net Tuesday San Francisco. The focus is community engagement & community tools, so come, engage your NetSquared community.

On that same day, NetSquared community members will gather at the Stag’s Head Pub in Houston, TX for their second NetSquared meetup.

The next day, April 12th, NetSquared builders in Washington, DC will re-convene at Buffalo Billiards

Soon, Net Tuesday will be coming to LA. Tell your SoCal friends to join the Net Tuesday LA group

Don’t live in one of these locations? Answer the Net2Builders Call to Action & Host a Meetup in Your Town!

WTF

Now here’s something you don’t see everyday. Scoble reports that Microsoft has opened Port 25… apparently an open source software lab. Marketing shenanigans or the real deal? You decide!

Apparently the result of Scoble’s influence on Microsoft’s culturepor the slumbering giant is final waking up. Jim Allchin wasn’t kidding about “hearing us” (the open source community that is) as evidenced by Bill Hiff‘s explanation of this new site:

So why is it called Port 25? Some background on port numbers first. SMTP is short for Simple Mail Transfer Protocol and is the protocol for sending email messages between servers or from a mail client to a mail server. On a server, the port for SMTP is 25. When you open a port on a server, such as to allow for SMTP traffic, it is commonly referred to as ‘listening’ on the port. Port 25, therefore, is a metaphor for how we are opening the communication lines to for a discussion around Open Source Software and Microsoft. Cute, huh?

It’s like an open source feedback loop for Microsoft? Fer rizzle? Shucks man, that’s so… neat!

So …if Microsoft can open up, why can’t our government go more open source? Why are there leaks? When was the last time an open source project dealt with a leak? Exactly.

Now imagine if the government published something like this on whitehouse.gov:

What will you find here? This will be the place we not only blog, but also where we put analysis from our OSS labs and also where we discuss and show other parts of [the government] that we think are just plain cool or interesting. I think what you’ll see here over time is how a bunch of open source guys inside [the government] think, as well as people and technologies inside [DC] that we think other folks like us would find interesting as well.

So, there will be much more to discuss, debate and learn from together – but for now, port 25 is open.

It’s kind of like bringing in a bunch of minority party folks together to create a “work tank” of sorts (thanks Lane) to keep the majority party in check, seeing as how there’s no one in government doing that now.