RIAA says “EFF You iPod rippers!”

EFF the RIAAMan oh man oh man.

Man oh man!

Seriously, could the RIAA make it any easier for us?

Listen fellas, yeah, youze guys with the stogies up in your crystal palace puffin away and chucklin’ to each other about how you’re going to ‘crush’ those ‘infringers’… Yeah, seriously, ya know what, we’re sick of being abused by you. We’re sick of being fed your garbage — of the idea that you think that you control everything and can dictate the rules of my use of your “product” long after I’ve bought and paid for it.

Look, I dunno what planet you guys think you’re on and what legal system is going to end up supporting your stilted worldview, but it doesn’t even matter. Because you’re irrelevant. You’re meaningless. What you’re doing is like a slow train wreck euthanasia; we’re all watching you pen your own demise, over months and months of screwing your best customers. I mean — it’s so painfully clear to us! Why is this not obvious to you?

Oh oh, okay, I know — you’re saying “well, we can afford to be the bad guys and get everyone’s hate-ons directed as us because we’ve got players in bed with us that could smite you without even thinking about it.”

And you know what, while that’s true, you’re still not getting it. Because I’m just one paucitous individual. Get rid of me, two will fall in line to replace me. Take them out, four more. And on and on. That’s what you don’t get. And when you start screwing with people who own iPods, holy crap!, you’re unleashing a wrath far more powerful than the DOJ or your own fatcat legal hegemons: the MySpaceXangaLiveJournalOrkut kids and their parents.

So don’t say we didn’t warn you. Since, yeah, it’ll be our eyes that you’ll be staring up into questioningly as you realize that you’ve taken yourself out.

The Acquisition Economy

It does seem as though Web 2.0 is not really about attempting to go-it-alone and making independent success (as was the apparent trend in Web 1.0) more about greek-alphabet soup acquisitions and buy-outs.

Anyway, I’m not the first to make this point, but it does seem that most end up being picked up in beta.. or alpha. Etc: Measure Map gets acquired by Google in something like the Alpha phase. Delicious was probably in gamma, flickr said beta but was more like delta.

Anyway, now we’ve got an arms race between Google and Yahoo for my soul. Microsoft is trying to catch up, but remains mostly irrelevant.

Kind of makes you wonder: is there room for the independent in The Acquisition Economy 2.0?

…Especially when you can buy just an employee and leave his company behind?

Out of Towner V: Scott Kveton redux

Scott KvetonScott’s coming back to town for OSBC and wants to meet up to discuss the work we’ve been doing on creating a new open source foundation as well as a new open-identity/open-auth project that might actually kick start Rhyzomatic and create a vehicle for an independent identity system… (yes yes, there are already a million solutions out there but we’re hoping to figure out an open source approach to get them all to play nice with each other).

So, tonight, February 13 at 8pm; the Argent Hotel in San Francisco. Totally last minute, but if you’re in for some hot and fast brainstorming on these issues — and to welcome our out-of-towner guest — be there!

technorati tags: , , ,

Qumana 3.0 Beta out; state of the blogtoolosphere

Qumana LogoQumana has released the 3.0 beta of their blog editor, touting the following features:

  • a “blog manager” that locally stores your drafts and published posts
  • support for trackbacks and pinging
  • improved editor with valid XHTML, plus ability to view and edit code
  • a way to refresh the editor (‘New Post’) – to clear away published material and start a new post instantly
  • improved image dialogue, including preview and auto upload trigger from Drag & Drop

Looking through their Tour, there’s some remarkable similarities in their workflows to how we’ve solved similar issues in Flock (adding a blog, tagging). This suggests to me that there is some consolidation and consensus emerging in client-side blogging apps. MarsEdit 1.1 similarly added tags late last year and some other niceties.

Some things are still pretty unique to each editor… like Qumana’s Adgenta program or the DropPad feature that enables drag and drop blogging from the desktop (Ecto has something like this as well). Ecto also features email integration with the Mac Address Book to notify your friends of updated posts.

But so besides pimping Qumana’s release (hey, more choice is a good thing!), I also wanted to point out that we’re starting to see at the least the beginnings of some standard features in blogging apps, including a kludge for consistently adding tags to posts. As I use the excellent Ultimate Tag Warrior to tag my posts (when composing via the web interface), I’m hoping that tags will soon become something represented in the standard blogging APIs (I know Matt‘s already done some work on this that we’ll be taking advantage of soon). Once that happens, tools like Flock, Performancing, Ecto, MarsEdit, Qumana and so on will be able to offer native tag support and not just append that extra data to the body of the posts.

Ohmifrog, Amazon, cut it out!

An Amazon plogWhat the eff is a plog™?! Oh oh, I see….! It’s a trademarked word that you made up that means “reverse blog”! How stupid is that!

Ok, here’s how you explain it:

Your Amazon.com Plog™ is a personalized web log that appears on your customer home page. Every person’s Plog™ is different (hence the name) and just like a blog, your Plog™ is sorted in reverse chronological order. Each post also gives you the opportunity to provide feedback to the sender as to whether you liked the post or not. This feedback loop means your Plog becomes even more relevant and interesting over time. Your Plog™ will appear if you are logged into our web site and is visible only to you.

And here’s my gripe: a “plog™” — if that’s really the best you could come up with — and if it’s supposed to inherit anything from its “blog” heritage — should be about original authorship, not about having other people’s content thrown at you.

I mean, hey, great, I like the idea. In general. But don’t call them “plogs™”. Call them “authors’ blogs” and let me subscribe to them when it’s contextually relevant — i.e. when I’m on one of the author’s book pages! Or call it what it really is: “The Personalized Amazon Feed Reader”. I know that’s not as sexy and doesn’t relate to the “authoring” connotation of “plogging”, but y’know, you’re only one consonant away from offering what might otherwise be considered “™”.

Hey, uh… Google?

Two-FaceSo first you get props for telling the government to go eff itself and then you go and basically give the government an awesome loophole to circumvent the fourth amendment.

Brilliant!

No really — you do realize what you’ve done here with Google Desktop, right? By storing in plain text all the contents of someone’s harddrive on your servers, the government now no longer needs a search warrant to go after that data… they only need a subpeona for your servers. If it’s my data, I don’t even need to be notified!

And this is exactly the point that the EFF has made. I mean, hey, props for taking on the government, but history’s proven that no matter how big you are, you’re still not bigger than the government — regardless of your stock price, but dude, they are the ones who enforce the legal system that makes it possible for you to exist. Don’t fuggit that.

And yeah yeah, I know you’ve built in a means for getting my data off your servers, but the fact that it’ll take 60 days seems a bit… worrisome… as well:

If you cancel your Google Account or uninstall Google Desktop, the files indexed in the Search Across Computers feature will no longer be accessible through Google Desktop and may remain on our servers for up to 60 days before being deleted.

I mean, that’s kind of like leaving your credit card receipts and wallet at your ex-girlfriend’s place and not being able to make sure that indeed she’s not using it for nefarious purposes (or sharing it with her new boyfriend who’s in the FBI) for two months. Except my ex-girlfriends don’t tend to keep my data in a vault behind some Fort Knoxian security systems. But I digress.

Seriously dudes, ‘sup wit dat? You’re reaaaaaally startin’ to freak me out.

USPTO to hold open source meeting

My buddy Steven M. Nipper tipped me off to a meeting being held Feb 16 by the USPTO to further work begun in December, to ensure that patent examiners have improved access to all available prior art relating to software code during the patent examination process.

Unforunately I won’t be able to make it to Virginia in time, but if you’re interested and in the area, it might be good to have some small-time representatives there to vouch for the little guy! They’re limiting attendence to 220, so sign up ASAP.

Out of stealth at 106 Miles

Speaking about stuff and nonsense

Went and was a “contender” at Joyce Parks’ and Adam “I Find Karma” Rifkin 106 Miles gathering tonight against Kevin “Rank that Tail” Burton.

Yeah well, I think there was less antagonism than Joyce might have hoped for, but nevertheless, it was a good chance to actually express some of my varied views on the state of open source, the Bubble 2.0, the whole stealth/beta thing… and a couple other topics. Maybe someone will podcast it, I dunno.

David Weekly told me his biggest takeaway had to do with having some humility when launching something on the web… which, I admit, Flock did not. And which, I admit, caused us to experience a trial by fire that taught us a great deal about the way things are… and about the important of expressing, with clarity and honesty, why you might not exactly have the kind of humility one should have when coming out and boldly pronouncing that you’re going to change the world…

Well, I’ll keep it brief, but the story goes like this: I came to San Francisco a little over a year and half ago. And when I got here, I knew no one. But through the power of networks, open source… getting involved in Mozilla and CivicSpace at the right time, hell, I was able to get the job I currently have now, doing what I’ve always dreamed of doing: taking back control over technology and putting it to work for regular folks (myself included!).

So when I came to Flock and helped formulate the vision for what they should build, well shit, I was full of vim and vinegar and busting to tell the world all about it.

And so I did. Publicly. On our website. On our website that asked for your email address. And that was just like the countless other “private beta” sites that cropped up around the Web 2.0 conference.

Which was fine and good and so on, but that now represents something dirty or tainty it seems. Well whatever, that’s not the important thing here.

The issue is how we launched Flock… and how all this beautiful enthusiasm and hope and optimism turned into vengeful anti-hype and disdain. And whether or not, given the opportunity, I would have done anything differently.

The answer, simply, is, “no”.

We endured a trial by fire that any project with our level of visibility deserved. We underwent a continued scorching that demanded to know whether or not we were legit or just the first in what might become a trend in Mozilla-derivative businesses using the success of Firefox to get ahead.

Are we? Well, I don’t know. Really. That’s not the project that I think I’m working on, but I’m just a lucky kid who happened into this mix of things. And I’m emboldened by the success I found on the Mozilla project; on having my ad in the New York Times, on being mentioned in Wired and Rolling Stone. These are things I never dreamed of when I came out here — why would I? But having experienced them — serendipitously — I’m convinced, as I was prior to Web 2.0, that what we’re doing is important, is relevant, has the potential to change things… and for the better.

What we didn’t communicate when we launched was a timeline — was how long it would take to get to the fabled One Dot Oh, if indeed that denomination even makes sense anymore. While I was going off on how we were going to change the web and, by extension, the world, I forget to mention that, Oh yeah, this’ll take us a couple years. So don’t hold your breath… just yet.

But y’know, at the same time — well, I’m glad that we said what we said. I’m proud of the vision that we have for Flock. It’s saying something — it’s taking a risk where it might make more “sense” to stick with conventional wisdom of what a browser is all about… And heck, I don’t know if we’re going to succeed and make this thing happen now, today, this time around. In the end, it doesn’t really matter. What’s important is that we’re asking these questions, now, that browser-makers can start to think about expanding beyond the baseline concepts of “history” and “bookmarks” in the browser and start to incorporate “people”… “web services”… “syndicated content”. And on and on.

Anyway, as I’ve just blabbed all this out, this is part of the humility — the mea culpa of saying, “Man, did we learn a lot!” And yeah, I’m sharing it with you just because, well, it’s worth knowing that if we had it to do all over again, maybe a touch more of humility would have helped, but no, I wouldn’t do it any different than what we did.

Apple “Show Fonts” Doesn’t

Show Swords

So I realized that Apple really dropped the ball going for mega-control over font output in Apple apps… “Show Fonts” does anything but.

I mean, yeah, there’s a lot of options in there to tweak — but I think the problem is made worse by the number of things going on.

How about this? Ditch 90% of that UI (and I’m an amateur type snob, so this would represent a big loss of control for me here!). Try this: offer a selector for “Voice”. As in, y’know, “what voice do you want to convey this thought with?”

So you’re writing up a document and man, that sans-serif just ain’t conveying the emotion of what you’re trying to say… Maybe you need a little more snark? Maybe anger? How about a whimper. Those are things that you can achieve in type. It’s not hard — there are new styles being released all the time. It’s like a Photoshoppian “Layer Style” for your thoughts.

Now here’s one more UI brainstorm: start out with the voice option and in step 2, toss up the recommended voice style encircled by similar but slightly different type styles… to “hone your voice”. Click on one of the other styles and the “voice cloud” rotates and now uses that new style as its central axis. Actually, this is very much like how Quicksilver’s eye-gooey Constellation UI works.

Eh? Eh? Whaddya think?