Crowdsourcing — the neue sweatshop labor

CrowdsourcedI wanted to quell this puppy before it gets any more play. It’s not just another innocuous Web 2.0 buzzword. Instead, ‘crowdsourcing’ as a business concept is a dangerous and caustic idea that attempts to rechristen the most seemingly “lucrative” aspects of the open source gift economy and architecture of collaboration as something that can be evaluated as an economic equation and leveraged against the hapless “public”.

Wired got it wrong when it established the term, putting business interests ahead of the community’s… suggesting it’d discovered a gold mine of cheap labor that could become the next wave after international outsourcing. What Wired should have said of course, casting it in such a light, was that it’d discovered the next source of legalized sweatshop labor where you never even need to meet face-to-face, let alone account for, the people doing the work.

is not a “new and nascent business tool for innovation“. Not unless you think that the machines in the Matrix were brilliant industrustrialists for tapping into the raw energy of human fetuses. And not unless your list of crowdsourcing guidelines flow in this order:

  1. Be focused
  2. Get Your Filters Right
  3. Tap The Right Crowds
  4. Build Community Into Social Networks

I mean, it’s like we should continue with the war metaphors or something. Here I’d thought we’d actually been advancing our civilization for the last 20 years (and no, feeding the employees of one of the world’s richest companies 1,000 pizzas is not progress).

So look, why are my panties all up in a twist over this? I mean, in proper contexts, when used by humans to describe themselves or their work (not the humans that law created), it’s not that big of a deal. But the problem is what happens when business discovers that term and instantly sees a way to cut costs, cut jobs and tap into the brainstem of its “target audience” whose “sticky eyeballs” they’ve already gouged out with a stick.

So okay, if I’m such a smart guy (did someone say smarmy?), what would I call it? Hmm, well, sorry to be a traditionalist, but I’d call it community collaboration or — in a phrase — learning to share your toys in a bigger sandbox.

Guidelines? Ok, well, from within a company, maybe a few:

  1. it’s all about respect. people deserve it. you have to earn it.
  2. it’s not about you.
  3. it’s not about you. (did I repeat myself?)
  4. it is about the people in the community that you want to serve
  5. don’t expect people to do what you want them to do
  6. redux: people won’t do what you want them to do
  7. repeat after me: I’m not in control, the community is
  8. …continue: I was never in control, the community just let me get away with thinking that I was
  9. there’s no free lunch so don’t expect no free labor (and no, your money’s no good here — to the contrary, cash is not “key to getting people to participate”)
  10. false humility will result in true resentment… save your patronization for the theatre
  11. don’t be a mosquito — mooching off the intellectual capital of your customers may seem like a great way to improve margins, but doing so is also a great way to cut your customer base.

So, some good examples of “corporate” community collaboration? How about the recent Yahoo Hack Day?

Folks who talk endlessly about the attitude to have about this stuff? Kathy Sierra. And of course.

So lessons learned? ‘Crowdsourcing’ is off limits for you corporate types. Call it ‘internet sweatshop labor’ if you need a new phrase. But keep your capitalist dog-eat-dog ethos out of open source. We’ve been there, we know what it looks like and it makes monsters out of people. Corporations are meant to serve individuals, not the other way around.

I’ve got one for you, which actually could make for a pretty good business model… instead of strapping more of your work on to the backs of your customers, why don’t we engage in some “corporatesourcing” for awhile? You do our bidding and act like you like it, m’kay? Pretend like it’s good for you — like a corporate retreat with Mistress Chi Chi or something. We’ll start with with you showing a little respect for the environment, with you taking a course in ethics and how to act like an adult, in how to bear humility, in how to “communicate honestly“, in not treating your customers like enemies who you have to defraud out of their hard-earned money, in owning up to your special interests and in engendering an economy that rewards fairness, open opportunity, diversity and in respecting the fundamental worth that every individual is imbued with. Sound good for a start?

Eudora to be reincarnated with a Thunderbird soul

Eudora + Thunderbird

In case you missed it, aging mail app Eudora will be put to pasture after its final commercial release (v7.1 on Windows, v6.2 on Mac) and reincarnated as a modified version of Mozilla’s open source mail app, Thunderbird:

“I’m excited for Eudora to be returning to the open source community,” said Steve Dorner, vice president of technology for QUALCOMM’s Eudora Group. “Using the Mozilla Thunderbird technology platform as a basis for future versions of Eudora will provide some key infrastructure that the existing versions lacked, such as a cross-platform code base and a world-class display engine. Making it open source will bring more developers to bear on Eudora than ever before.”

Michael Calore, of MonkeyBites, adds:

The company hopes that the Mozilla open source community will extend the feature set of Eudora (which is currently commercial software) much in the same way that they have done for Thunderbird. It’s a great development for the open source productivity space. Will it kill Microsoft Outlook? No, but it’s going to make millions of users who prefer alternative email clients very happy.

…snip…

Eudora is a well-loved if somewhat outdated email client that many people (Qualcomm claims millions of users, which sounds accurate) continue to use just for its unique feature set. Eudora can tell you if emails in your inbox contain inflammatory language before you open them, and it has some robust spam features. There’s a sponsored version of the client, as well, and my guess is that the ad-supported version will go the way of the ghost when Eudora becomes open source.

What with so many AJAX clients out there, including Apple’s upcoming DotMacMail, this development is not entirely surprising. For stalwart Eudora users who have much resisted the allure and blinding shininess of Web 2.0, this could spell the real beginning of the end of Web 1.0.

The tamagotchi of Web 2.0

Celly is my tamagotchi

So there were a couple of announcements from Twitter today (like status permalinks), and one half-mentioned Celly — the cutest and most social thing to come out of Web 2.0 leveraging a newly minted API.

As Tara likes to say, “Ev Williams is my Tamagotchi!”

Well, now the whole Twitter community can be your Tamagotchi with Celly.app.

Download it direct or grab the source.

This is just another neat WebKit app made possible by the work of Josh Peek, Chip Cuccio and others.

A solution for Google Calendar on Blackberry 8700c

Gah, finally!

I meant to write about this ages ago, but now that Version 1.1 is out thanks to Thomas Oldervoll, I can happily report that I have Google Calendar working on my Blackberry 8700c!

For awhile I was using 30Boxes Mobile as my Gcal proxy, but no longer! I can unhide that Calendar app on my Blackberry desktop now that I’ve got the open-source Gcalsync running!

Cut-to-the-chase instructions: load up wap.gcalsync.com on your Blackberry and install the signed version. Run the app. Choose Sync, type in your Google username and password (no idea how trustworthy this thing is) and hit Save. The Sync should commence.

Now, I had some issues with this, but it’s better than nothing, so I can only hope that Thomas will continue his work (or you’ll pitch in).

And hey, if it works for you, digg it.

A fresh face in people search, care of Sweden

Polar Rose

This isn’t new news, per se, but it’s still interesting to see that Riya 1.0 has some new competition (how’d’ya like that? Retroactive competition… heh!).

If you’ve been playing along, you’d know that Riya has moved towards general image search and away from exclusively focusing on cute-baby-face-image-indexing (I kid, I kid!). In fact, Munjal says it best:

As we announced in May we are heading in a different direction because users just didn’t want face recognition in their own photos as much as they wanted smarter web search. Starting next week and continuing for the next month or so we’ll post the gradual release of our new product that reluanches our efforts.

Contrary to Polar Rose founder Jan Erik Solem’s bombastic claim that their search engine … will be the first of its kind in the world, I am more optimistic about their approach of using a simple browser plugin to enable folks to casually point out faces in the images that they come across, effectively decentralizing the task and providing a much needed instant-incentive for folks who are specifically interested in this kind of information. I still wonder whether such efforts can ever really boil the web-wide ocean, but with similar efforts underway at Google, sooner or later, we are going to get to a better way to discover, explore and search rich media based on their content, not just where they were taken or when.

In the meantime, screenshots of the Polar Rose plugin are available for download.

Via Digg via Alex Hillman.

GoogTube it is

GoogTubeI don’t have anything useful to say about Google’s acquisition of YouTube, but it is interesting to look at their site’s information outlets moments after Mike made the announcement… Nate Anderson at Ars Technica picked these up too:

So anyway, there you go. Google acquires yet another piece of my life (though I do feel more cum-bah-ya with the folks at Blip.tv (and maybe Revver too)).

And I should add that those last deals from the press page are the one to watch out for. Not the Google deal. After all, Google has no content. YouTube has some, but Sony, Universal and CBS are the ones with the goods. Google’s purchase only helps YouTube weather the lawsuits and help it scale. After that, it comes down to content and community (oh, and DRM: how convenient it is for YouTube to ink deals with pro-DRM folks the same day as Teh GOOG. Suddenly they’ve bought into one of the more successful pipes of unlicensed content out there. With Google backing the service, you can imagine that this puppy will scale, too).

Don’t forget, too, that Google and Apple are all chummy-chummy, so expect to see some iTunes-cum-Gplayer synergies emerging… where you upload your iMixes to YouTube and Google churns them out with newly minted ads making the stockholders oh-so-proud.

Gotta love this new user-generated-economy.

Throwing punches from the future at the past

lincoln sizes arthur up
Photo by Mr. Wright. Some rights reserved.

It’s interesting to watch the brouhaha over Arrington vs the Old Media from the sidelines. I mean, personally I could care less who “comes out on top” even if there is a top to be had anymore (see my post on starfish and you’ll see why self-referenced A-listers and the Old Guard are threatened — or, as Tara has pointed out, that the New Guard behaves frightening like the Old (and should be routed around, like any efficient system should)).

As Jarvis says the way to win is to commit better journalism than [journalists] do.

Amen. Back to the ol’ meritocracy we’re all so fond of. Oh.. and that the old hegemonic guard despises.

You could stop reading there, but there are some juicy quotes that I think are worth pulling out, if only for posterity and for those of you without time to read a bunch of white men arguing amongst themselves in public:

From Jarvis:

The stinky-cheese irony of this is, of course, that even as [Arrington] tried to cast aspersions on The Times, he only succeeded in shooting his own credibility — and with it, likely, the credibility of fellow bloggers — in the foot.

Whoa-ho-ho…! By suggesting impropriety on the part of the Times, he shot down his and other bloggers’ credibility?? Ree-hee-healy! Starting to sound a little Bushian there, are we not? You’re either with us or against us and anything in between is treason?

I mean, correct me if I’m wrong, but the whole journalism-is-beyond-reproach thing is inherently part of the problem. Somehow the chain of command and fact-checking that journalists are supposed to do somehow gives them, prima facie, more credibility than bloggers … that out of that rigorous process, they have more ethics than bloggers … which basics ignores the entire history of human reportage (hell, even the few times I’ve been quoted in the MSM, I’ve been misrepresented).

When any medium of dissent becomes a pipe of flailing , you better believe that those on the receiving end, fed up with circular Newspeak abuse, will come up with a better means of communicating amongst one another, that’s both more local, more direct and subverts the existing hierarchy (or disintermediates them, as is popular to say).

It’s natural evolution, man.

So in that vein, I love what Steve Gillmor has to say:

Forget superior for a second, and look at what happened when music rebooted in the Sixties. Were The Beatles superior to Sinatra? Coltrane to Armstrong? Dylan to Guthrie? Did they boo Dylan? Yes they did. Now we see that as the watershed of the era. Was this a problem? Listen to the newly-discovered tape of Dylan with Butterfield’s band at Newport and it’s stunning in its obvious power. They were booing because they were insulted, scared, angry, moved.

I am moved by Arrington’s story. God knows I could care less about all this page view Web 2.0 shit that he’s leading, but when he doubts himself and suggests even briefly that he should prepare better for a next time, I say no fucking way. Prepare better for what? It’s like Hendrix dialing back the funk or Miles apologizing for standing with his back to the audience or any of you out there settling for the pathetic crap that floods the blogosphere or the so-called mainstream media. It’s hard to cut through the noise; it’s simple but dangerous to make enemies. In an interrupt-driven media world, where “bloggers” and “journalists” compete head to head on every story, it’s one big race for class president going on here.

The New York Times is a great publication on its good days, a lying pack of self-protective weasels on others. Same for every one of us in the blogosphere. When I see Arrington filibuster on the floor of the Senate, I see one of us out there making a fool, and us proud, of himself. Suck it up, mainstream media. Next time it’s your turn. Something is going on here and we do know what it is.